2015
DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201410-477oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dalhousie Pictorial Scales Measuring Dyspnea and Perceived Exertion during Exercise for Children and Adolescents

Abstract: Dalhousie Dyspnea and Perceived Exertion Scales offer an alternative to the Borg scale for use during exercise in pediatric subjects. Children and adolescents exhibit large variation in patterns of ratings of dyspnea and perceived exertion in incremental exercise.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conclude the Dalhousie Dyspnea and Perceived Exertion Scales yield comparable results to the Borg CR-10 scale in measuring dyspnea and perceived leg exertion during bicycle exercise in healthy adults and in adults with pulmonary disease. We already demonstrated feasibility and reproducibility of using the Dalhousie scales in a population of Italian children running on a treadmill in the hope that the pictorial nature of the scales would obviate need for verbal descriptors that might limit scale comprehension in subjects with limited literacy or understanding [ 13 ]. By the same reasoning, the Dalhousie scales can now be employed in exercise testing of adults in whom a clinician might have similar concerns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conclude the Dalhousie Dyspnea and Perceived Exertion Scales yield comparable results to the Borg CR-10 scale in measuring dyspnea and perceived leg exertion during bicycle exercise in healthy adults and in adults with pulmonary disease. We already demonstrated feasibility and reproducibility of using the Dalhousie scales in a population of Italian children running on a treadmill in the hope that the pictorial nature of the scales would obviate need for verbal descriptors that might limit scale comprehension in subjects with limited literacy or understanding [ 13 ]. By the same reasoning, the Dalhousie scales can now be employed in exercise testing of adults in whom a clinician might have similar concerns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reported that the Dalhousie scales accurately track dyspnea and perceived exertion during a maximal exercise test in a pediatric population of individuals with and without respiratory disease [ 12 ]. Most recently, we demonstrated excellent correlations between ratings of dyspnea and ventilation, or perceived exertion and work intensity, during incremental exercise in children and adolescents [ 13 ]. We now report validation studies for our Dalhousie Dyspnea and Perceived Exertion Scales in adults, both healthy and with pulmonary disease, via three steps: (1) comparison with the current “gold standard,” i.e., Borg scale (concurrent validity); (2) Dalhousie pictorial ratings of dyspnea should rise with increasing ventilation and of perceived exertion should rise with increasing work (content validity); and (3) determination that rating trajectories conformed to a power function (internal validity).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, dyspnea ratings were not recorded because existing dyspnea scales had dubious validity in children when testing began in 2007. We recently published our validation studies in pediatric subjects (Pianosi et al, 2014, 2015), and found remarkable similarity in dyspnea ratings during exercise among healthy controls, subjects with asthma, or cystic fibrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although exertional dyspnea was the reason for exercise testing, dyspnea ratings were not sought due to concern for validity of Borg scales in pediatrics (Pianosi et al, 2014; Pianosi et al, 2015). Finally, level of habitual activity was not gauged nor were subjects grouped according to training status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%