2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-015-1318-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage approach: A new method for topology optimization with local stress constraints

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a new method for topology optimization with local stress constraints. In this method, material in which a stress constraint is violated is considered as damaged. Since damaged material will contribute less to the overall performance of the structure, the optimizer will promote a design with a minimal amount of damaged material. We tested the method on several benchmark problems, and the results show that the method is a viable alternative for conventional stress-based approaches based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon was not observed for simple compliance minimization under mesh refinement for which the densities in void regions converged to a value closer to zero (≈ 3 · 10 −5 ). However, it was also observed using other approaches for stress-constrained topology optimization; e.g., the damage approach (Verbart et al, 2015) and the conventional approach of constraint relaxation followed by aggregation. For example, Figure 15 shows a result obtained by considering qp-relaxed stresses aggregated into a single P -norm constraint (Le et al, 2009).…”
Section: Effect Of Mesh Refinementmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This phenomenon was not observed for simple compliance minimization under mesh refinement for which the densities in void regions converged to a value closer to zero (≈ 3 · 10 −5 ). However, it was also observed using other approaches for stress-constrained topology optimization; e.g., the damage approach (Verbart et al, 2015) and the conventional approach of constraint relaxation followed by aggregation. For example, Figure 15 shows a result obtained by considering qp-relaxed stresses aggregated into a single P -norm constraint (Le et al, 2009).…”
Section: Effect Of Mesh Refinementmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Examples of aggregation functions that have been applied in literature are the Kreisselmeier-Steinhauser function (KS-function hereafter) (Kreisselmeier, 1979;Yang and Chen, 1996), and the P -norm (Duysinx and Sigmund, 1998). Recently, the authors have proposed an alternative solution (Verbart et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of λ is determined by whether the local stress constraints are satisfied. The material in which a stress constraint is violated is considered as damaged, and then, the corresponding local structural performance is penalized. The stress penalty factor α is used to control the penalization weight, which is of vital importance for controlling the local stress level because it makes the stresses that are larger than the allowable stresses play a prominent role during the optimization.…”
Section: Topology Description and Optimization Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bruggi and Duysinx too have considered discretisations in the order of 10 000 FE's. Other recent developments include the level set method by Emmendoerfer and Fancello and the so‐called ‘damage approach’ by Verbart et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%