2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage assessment in structures using combination of a modified Cornwell indicator and genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A disadvantage, for example, is that they require great calculation effort. [8] Some of the recent damage detection studies have been conducted using GA. For instance, Tiachacht et al [9] have introduced a new identification technique for 2D and 3D structures, using GA and modified Cornwell indicator (MCI). In their paper, an objective function based on MCI is defined for damage detection and severity identification for structural elements based on modal information of damaged structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A disadvantage, for example, is that they require great calculation effort. [8] Some of the recent damage detection studies have been conducted using GA. For instance, Tiachacht et al [9] have introduced a new identification technique for 2D and 3D structures, using GA and modified Cornwell indicator (MCI). In their paper, an objective function based on MCI is defined for damage detection and severity identification for structural elements based on modal information of damaged structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They solve an inverse problem by building a physics-based model and then updating its parameters until the response of the model matches that which is measured in the real structure. Although this approach is currently under exhaustive research [19][20][21][22][23][24][25], it still presents some drawbacks in the assessment of real systems. Such drawbacks include the need for high-quality data and the impossibility to provide real-time insight due to the computational effort required to solve the updating problem [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaveh and Dadras [20] enhanced Thermal Exchange Optimization (TEO) and applied for structural damage detection. Tiachacht et al [21] presented a new methodology based on model updating method for damage identification and quantification of two-and three-dimensional structures using the Genetic Algorithm (GA). Jahangiri et al [22] presented an efficient damage detection technique based on a hybrid objective function and using the only first vibration mode data utilizing meta-heuristic optimization algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%