2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.02.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage assessment in truss structures with limited sensors using a two-stage method and model reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where [f i , φ i ] and [f k i , φ k i ] mean the i-th noise-free and contaminated natural frequencies and modal shapes, respectively; σ stands for the noise pollution level [38][39][40]; and rand is a random number that ranges from −1 to 1.…”
Section: Example Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where [f i , φ i ] and [f k i , φ k i ] mean the i-th noise-free and contaminated natural frequencies and modal shapes, respectively; σ stands for the noise pollution level [38][39][40]; and rand is a random number that ranges from −1 to 1.…”
Section: Example Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yin et al (2017) developed a probabilistic methodology based on FEM reduction technique and Bayesian inference for a bolted connection damage identification. Dinh-Cong et al (2018b) presented a two-stage method of damage assessment in truss structures. At first, they introduced a new damage indicator called normalized modal strain energy-based damage index, and they subsequently located the damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27] Dinh-Cong et al introduced a damage identification method using teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm and Neumann series expansionbased model reduction method. [28] Some of the studies revolving around damage detection with limited data are included in precious studies. [29][30][31] Mirjalili et al have introduced some nature-inspired algorithms, [32][33][34][35][36] namely, grey wolf optimizer (GWO), moth-flame optimization (MFO), salp swarm algorithm (SSA), ant lion optimization (ALO), and whale optimization algorithm (WOA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 27 ] Dinh‐Cong et al introduced a damage identification method using teaching–learning‐based optimization algorithm and Neumann series expansion‐based model reduction method. [ 28 ] Some of the studies revolving around damage detection with limited data are included in precious studies. [ 29–31 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%