2020
DOI: 10.21595/vp.2019.21081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage detection in a fixed-fixed beam using natural frequency changes

Abstract: This paper presents a damage detection technique which uses change in Frequency Response Function (FRF) and Modal Strain Energy (MSE) for damage detection in beam and truss like structures. It's a robust approach for Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) using natural frequency for structural damage assessment. This technique couples FRF with Iterative Modal Strain Energy (IMSE) method to accurately localize and quantify the damage with only few frequencies, overcoming the limitation of mode shape based damage de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance between the simulation points and the measurement points varied widely. Thus, on the bridge deck span, points 3,18,33,48,58,59,64,65,70,71,76, and 77 were selected as simulation points; and between piers, points 86, 89,98,101,115,116,127,128,135,136,147,148,159,160,162,165,174,177,186, and 189 were considered. These points were analyzed for each year of bridge life with constant location.…”
Section: Description Of the Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distance between the simulation points and the measurement points varied widely. Thus, on the bridge deck span, points 3,18,33,48,58,59,64,65,70,71,76, and 77 were selected as simulation points; and between piers, points 86, 89,98,101,115,116,127,128,135,136,147,148,159,160,162,165,174,177,186, and 189 were considered. These points were analyzed for each year of bridge life with constant location.…”
Section: Description Of the Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequency-domain techniques may create many responses and data points by configuring model-update equations [11]. Mode shape [12,13], modal curvatures [14][15][16], natural frequency [17,18], modal strain energy [19,20], the frequency response function [21,22], and the power spectral density function [23][24][25] are some methods of dynamic frequency-domain approaches. Lastly, required data and information in the timefrequency domain are obtained by changing the recorded signal frequency over time [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the increased severity of damage, the absence of a peak damage index and the emergence of an unforeseen alternating pattern in the TDI at Segment 2 can be attributed to the fixed support's tendency to constrain the displacement and movement of the structure in that specific segment. Due to its stabilising nature, the fixed support effectively restricts excessive deformation, thereby mitigating potential damage in that segment (Khan et al, 2020). As a result, the response and damage may be relatively lower compared to other segments of the structure.…”
Section: Mode Shape Curvaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various signal-based methods are those that operate in either the time domain technique [24,25], the frequency domain technique [26,27], or the time-frequency domain technique [28,29]. Some dynamic frequency-domain approaches used as non-destructive damage detection methods include natural frequencies [30,31], modal curvatures [32,33], modal strain energies [34,35], frequency response functions (FRF) [36,37], and power spectral density (PSD) [38,39]. Of these methods, the PSD is one of the frequency-domain techniques that use the responses of a periodic or randomized stimulus in frequencies to describe the mean power repartition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%