2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.102494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage detection in adhesively bonded single lap joints by using backface strain: Proposing a new position for backface strain gauges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of directly looking for defects, there are relatively more economical techniques suitable for real-time monitoring of the integrity degradation of adhesive joints. These include strain/stiffness monitoring using back face strain gages [21][22][23], resistance monitoring of adhesive joints made conductive by adding carbon nanotubes [24,25] and optical fiber sensors signal surveillance [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. Strain gages can only be applied to the outer surface, but they will disrupt an otherwise smooth surface and are susceptible to environmental degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of directly looking for defects, there are relatively more economical techniques suitable for real-time monitoring of the integrity degradation of adhesive joints. These include strain/stiffness monitoring using back face strain gages [21][22][23], resistance monitoring of adhesive joints made conductive by adding carbon nanotubes [24,25] and optical fiber sensors signal surveillance [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. Strain gages can only be applied to the outer surface, but they will disrupt an otherwise smooth surface and are susceptible to environmental degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al [6] used a surface strain gauge technique to measure the strain of SLJs and found that there was a linear relationship between surface strain and load. Sadeghi et al [7] proposed a location for positioning the back-face strain gauge on the adhesively bonded SLJs for damage detection. Moroni et al [8] selected different pre-treatments to be applied over aluminum and stainless steel adherents' surfaces and provided the state of the surface morphology of SLJs.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/mats202000066mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sadeghi et al. [ 7 ] proposed a location for positioning the back‐face strain gauge on the adhesively bonded SLJs for damage detection. Moroni et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local moisture content can be monitored by embedded interdigital electrode sensor that made use of impedance changes [ 46 ] and optical fiber evanescent sensor that depended on light energy loss with surrounding refractive index changes [ 47 , 48 ]. Computational methods have been developed to predict the diffusion of moisture and the swelling strain under known boundary conditions [ 13 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ]. The calculated moisture contents agreed well with the gravimetrically measured ones [ 13 , 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of monitoring moisture content or directly looking for defects, there are techniques suitable for real time monitoring of the integrity degradation of adhesive joints. These include strain/stiffness monitoring using back face strain gages [ 49 , 50 , 51 ], resistance monitoring of adhesive joints that were made conductive by adding carbon nanotubes [ 52 , 53 ] and optical fiber sensors signal surveillance [ 43 , 44 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 ]. Strain gages can only be applied to the outer surface, they will disrupt an otherwise smooth surface and are susceptible to environmental degradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%