2011
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.243-249.1963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage Detection of Self-Anchored Suspension Bridge Based on Neural Network Model and Genetic-Simulated Annealing Algorithm

Abstract: According to the characteristics of self-anchored suspension bridge, a new method to detect damage is introduced in this paper.It works in two stages.First, a BP neural network model is built to predict damaged position. Next, based on the characteristics of genetic algorithm and simulated annealing algorithm, a new approach, genetic-simulated annealing algorithm, is put forward to identify damage extent of detected positions. Compared with the traditional genetic algorithm, the global convergence effect of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang and Sun proposed a damage detection and quantification method for self‐anchored suspension bridge using the BP neural network model and genetic‐simulated annealing algorithm; damage is detected using a BP neural network model, and the damage severity is assessed with the genetic‐simulated annealing algorithm; the global convergence effect of the proposed approach is enhanced compared with the conventional genetic algorithm. Wang and Ni proposed a damage detection and localization method for the suspension bridge; the proposed method is used for damage alarming based on the refined autoassociative neural network technique and damage localization based on the refined probabilistic neural network technique; a total of 15 damage cases in TsingMa suspension bridge located in Hongkong are considered in the numerical study to examine the performance of the method in which damage was introduced in bearings of the tower and deck, a side span cable and an anchorage, a tower saddle and a Tower cross‐beam, hangers, deck members, and rail way beams; the reliability of the proposed damage identification technique is verified: The autoassociative neural network using flexibility coefficients performs better than that formulated using modal frequencies in identifying minor damage with noisy data; results based on the adaptive probabilistic neural network are much better compared with the traditional probabilistic neural network in the case of high noise level.…”
Section: Recent Progress On Damage Identification Methods For Suspensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang and Sun proposed a damage detection and quantification method for self‐anchored suspension bridge using the BP neural network model and genetic‐simulated annealing algorithm; damage is detected using a BP neural network model, and the damage severity is assessed with the genetic‐simulated annealing algorithm; the global convergence effect of the proposed approach is enhanced compared with the conventional genetic algorithm. Wang and Ni proposed a damage detection and localization method for the suspension bridge; the proposed method is used for damage alarming based on the refined autoassociative neural network technique and damage localization based on the refined probabilistic neural network technique; a total of 15 damage cases in TsingMa suspension bridge located in Hongkong are considered in the numerical study to examine the performance of the method in which damage was introduced in bearings of the tower and deck, a side span cable and an anchorage, a tower saddle and a Tower cross‐beam, hangers, deck members, and rail way beams; the reliability of the proposed damage identification technique is verified: The autoassociative neural network using flexibility coefficients performs better than that formulated using modal frequencies in identifying minor damage with noisy data; results based on the adaptive probabilistic neural network are much better compared with the traditional probabilistic neural network in the case of high noise level.…”
Section: Recent Progress On Damage Identification Methods For Suspensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Some studies propose two-step methods [100,102,108,115,122]; what is the necessity of implementing these methodologies?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several damage identification methods for bridge structures currently available, including intelligent algorithm-based, Bayesian theory-based, time-domain signal processing-based damage identification methods, sparsity information and sparse recovery theory-based, neural network-based damage identification methods, and various modelbased methods [27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. These approaches are described conceptually and then proven in actual bridges through tests and experimentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%