2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage evolution behavior of bi-adhesive repaired composites under bending load by acoustic emission and micro-CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as a typical signals belonging to different damage types might have similar amplitude and energy levels and therefore overlapping regions, making it challenging to categorize the signals. To address this problem, previous studies [17][18][19] revealed that the peak frequency data is a good choice for clustering and results in more accurate classification of damage mechanisms. Additionally, the decision of which cluster corresponds to which damage mechanism is greatly influenced by the cumulative energy data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as a typical signals belonging to different damage types might have similar amplitude and energy levels and therefore overlapping regions, making it challenging to categorize the signals. To address this problem, previous studies [17][18][19] revealed that the peak frequency data is a good choice for clustering and results in more accurate classification of damage mechanisms. Additionally, the decision of which cluster corresponds to which damage mechanism is greatly influenced by the cumulative energy data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was seen from these studies that solely the amplitude data was not sufficient to distinguish damage mechanisms rationally. Therefore, to alleviate this ambiguity, several authors suggested the use of peak frequency and cumulative energy data for well-distinguished damage detection [17][18][19]. For instance, Pashmforoush et al [19] stated that the k-means genetic algorithm is one of the most suitable clustering algorithms for damage classification using the peak frequency and the cumulative energy data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The features of AE event, including amplitude, duration, rise time, counts, energy, centroid frequency, peak frequency, and RA value, recorded during the three-point bending test were selected for correlation analysis and principal component analysis (PCA). In our previous study, 17,35 peak frequency, amplitude, and RA value were selected for unsupervised clustering analysis. Then, the number of cluster k was calculated using the range from 2 to 10 and two cluster validity techniques, namely, DB index and Sil index were used to evaluate the best clustering performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ignore background noise, a threshold of 10 mV was established. Based on our previous research, [24] the values of peak definition time (PDT), hit definition time (HDT), and hit lock out time (HLT) parameters were set to 30 μs, 150 μs, and 300 μs in the tests respectively.…”
Section: Experimental Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%