2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage identification in composite materials using ultrasonic based Lamb wave method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With the help fitted peak value and percentage amplitude at constant gain 55 (db) Lamb waves generation frequency is identified for different materials. Figure 4 shows the histogram representation of % amplitude of the waveform with a bin range of 0-820 kHz of pulser [21,22]. The most effective range of frequencies to generate Lamb waves is 140-420 kHz.…”
Section: Generation Of Optimal Lamb Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the help fitted peak value and percentage amplitude at constant gain 55 (db) Lamb waves generation frequency is identified for different materials. Figure 4 shows the histogram representation of % amplitude of the waveform with a bin range of 0-820 kHz of pulser [21,22]. The most effective range of frequencies to generate Lamb waves is 140-420 kHz.…”
Section: Generation Of Optimal Lamb Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper [20] presents the method of damage identification in an aluminum plate with riveted stiffeners. Ultrasonic based Lamb wave method damage identification in composite materials is discussed elaborately [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These defects can significantly affect the mechanical properties of the structure, resulting in degradation of overall structural performance in operating condition and sometimes lead to some unexpected catastrophic failure. The existing structural health monitoring techniques like ultrasonic scanning technique [1] are generally offline in nature. Besides, these conventional methods of structural fault diagnosis are also time-consuming, expensive and laborious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%