2011
DOI: 10.1002/stc.448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage identification procedure for seismically isolated bridges

Abstract: SUMMARY This paper deals with a procedure for the identification of the damage in bridge structures equipped with isolators and/or energy dissipating devices. The procedure is based on the availability of accelerometric records from any simple sensor network installed on existing bridges. The proposed algorithm provides an assessment of the performance degradation of conventional structural components as well as installed isolators and energy dissipators, obtained from changes in modal characteristic of the st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gentile et al (2015) applied microwave remote sensing to measure the vibration response on the stay cables of two cable-stayed bridges, which validates that the radar technology is suitable to the SHMS. Bonessio et al (2012) proposed a procedure to estimate existing bridge damage by installing some accelerometers. Arangio et al (2014) made use of the Bayesian neural networks to identify the damage of the cable-stayed bridge.…”
Section: Some Methods For Structural Status Damage Identification and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gentile et al (2015) applied microwave remote sensing to measure the vibration response on the stay cables of two cable-stayed bridges, which validates that the radar technology is suitable to the SHMS. Bonessio et al (2012) proposed a procedure to estimate existing bridge damage by installing some accelerometers. Arangio et al (2014) made use of the Bayesian neural networks to identify the damage of the cable-stayed bridge.…”
Section: Some Methods For Structural Status Damage Identification and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, various SHM systems, including electronic endoscopes, fiber‐optic sensors, wireless sensors, and radio‐frequency identification devices, have been developed to diagnose the health of engineering structures. [ 13–16 ] However, the installation and operation of these sophisticated systems require highly trained experts, leading to high costs. Every construction structure exhibits presymptoms (e.g., cracking and distortion) before it collapses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of a vibration‐based damage identification method to distinguish between the damaged and undamaged states of a structure strongly depends on the data representation. Unfortunately, the best solutions to detect changes in the dynamic properties of a structure are target oriented (e.g., in the work of Ceravolo et al and Bonessio et al). They can be developed either in time, or in frequency, or in time‐frequency domains depending on the employed level of data condensation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%