2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2022.106743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage identification using wave damage interaction coefficients predicted by deep neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce this large computational effort, the application of numerical surrogate models (e.g., ML models) can be used to lower the number of required simulations by interpolation. An approach was recently demonstrated for the accurate interpolation of simulated guided wave signals by Humer [ 33 ]. The available simulated signals (and their correlated and known damage parameters) enable very fast damage identification, by simply comparing their similarity to measured EMI spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce this large computational effort, the application of numerical surrogate models (e.g., ML models) can be used to lower the number of required simulations by interpolation. An approach was recently demonstrated for the accurate interpolation of simulated guided wave signals by Humer [ 33 ]. The available simulated signals (and their correlated and known damage parameters) enable very fast damage identification, by simply comparing their similarity to measured EMI spectra.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the cost of significant computational power requirements, numerical methods allow for complex real case scenario simulation. Recent advances covers in particular: Guided waves scattering on impact damage of composite structures [ 43 , 47 ] or delaminations [ 48 ]; Transmission of guided waves across partially-closed cracks [ 49 ]; Wave damage interaction coefficients for lightweight structures [ 10 ]; Damage of reinforced concrete beams [ 50 ]; Looseness of joint structures in cylindrical waveguides [ 51 ]; Matrix cracking in laminated composites [ 52 ]. …”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, analyzing these output signals is a non-trivial task due to the complexity of the output. This naturally motivates research in applying the latest advances in machine learning for processing and interpreting these signals [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. However, machine learning generally requires vast amounts of data to be appropriately trained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu and Zhang [19] converted the Lamb wave signal into an image, and the deep CNN was used to process the converted image, the notch-type crack damage detection in thin metal plates was achieved, and they experimentally verified that the method had a significant improvement in detection and classification accuracy compared with the traditional neural network. The deep neural network (DNN) was used by Humer et al [20] to enhance the wave damage interaction coefficients database for realizing the prediction of plate structure damage identification. Rai and Mitra [21] developed a deep learning model with multi-head onedimensional convolutional neural network, which can directly operate the obtained discrete time domain Lamb wave signals and accurately predict the damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%