1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1365-1609(97)00053-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage initiation through extension fracturing in a moderately jointed brittle rock mass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At low confining stresses, spalling strength in the field occurs at 0.33 to 0.5 times the UCS of that determined in the laboratory. The field spalling strength has been found to be comparable to the crack initiation (CI) threshold in the laboratory with a slope considering the HB criterion of mi = 0 (Martin 1993;Castro et al 1997;Diederichs 1999). At higher confining pressures, the field peak strength is typically found to be around a factor of 0.8 lower (i.e.…”
Section: Strength Envelopes and Confinement Dependent Failure Processmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At low confining stresses, spalling strength in the field occurs at 0.33 to 0.5 times the UCS of that determined in the laboratory. The field spalling strength has been found to be comparable to the crack initiation (CI) threshold in the laboratory with a slope considering the HB criterion of mi = 0 (Martin 1993;Castro et al 1997;Diederichs 1999). At higher confining pressures, the field peak strength is typically found to be around a factor of 0.8 lower (i.e.…”
Section: Strength Envelopes and Confinement Dependent Failure Processmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The difference between the major and minor principal stresses gives the highest shearing effect possible, and it is an important parameter that is used frequently in the assessment of mining-induced stress within a rock mass (Castro 1996;Castro et al 1997;Diederichs 1999;Martin et al 1999). The maximum shear stress is half this differential stress as given in Equation (2) and the brittle shear ratio (BSR) is derived when the latter is divided by the unconfined compressive strength of an intact rock sample as presented in Equation (3) (Castro et al 2012;Martin et al 1999).…”
Section: Mining-induced Stressesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second criterion discussed in the literature relates the differential stress (1 -3) to the unconfined compressive strength of intact rock samples (UCSintact), and is known as the brittle shear ratio (BSR). The BSR is used mainly in the vicinity of underground openings as an indicator of fracture development within intact rock mass and strainbursts (Brace et al 1966;Castro 1996;Castro et al 2012;Castro et al 1997;Diederichs 1999;Martin 1997;Martin and Chandler 1994), and is calculated by:…”
Section: Differential Stress Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%