2020
DOI: 10.3390/ma13010218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage Localization of Composites Based on Difference Signal and Lamb Wave Tomography

Abstract: In order to deal with the problem of composite damage location, an imaging technique based on differential signal and Lamb wave tomography was proposed. Firstly, the feasibility of the technique put forward was verified by simulation. In this process, the composite model was regularly set down by the circular sensor array, with each sensor acting as an actuator in sequence to generate Lamb waves. Apart from that, other sensors were used to collect response signals. With regard to the damage factor, it was main… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the detection of defects, guided waves have also been used for the localization and imaging of defects. Most commonly, tomographic approaches are used for imaging based on guided waves [ 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the detection of defects, guided waves have also been used for the localization and imaging of defects. Most commonly, tomographic approaches are used for imaging based on guided waves [ 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lamb wave-based damage detection in plate-like structures draws increasing attention because Lamb waves can travel over a long distance even in materials with high attenuation and which are highly susceptible to damage along the propagation path [1,2]. Computerized tomography (CT) has been introduced in the Lamb-wave-based damage field and has shown great potential in quantitative damage imaging inside materials [3,4]. The superior performance of the reconstruction algorithm for the probabilistic Inspection of damage (RAPID) algorithm has been investigated through comparison with different CT algorithms [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These distribution functions depended on a scale/shape factor, β, which controlled the effective size of the elliptical probability area for each sensing path. Similarly, the RAPID and LWT methods used the difference between damaged and undamaged signals to define the signal difference coefficient (SDC) [23,24,[31][32][33][34]. The SDC also depended on β, which controlled the effective size of the probability region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SDC also depended on β, which controlled the effective size of the probability region. In most of these methods, the probability of finding the damage depended on the intersection of direct paths between actuator-sensors pairs [20,21,[23][24][25]30,[33][34][35][36]. The probability of accurately locating the damage increases if more direct path intersections fall around the damage region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation