Numerical Simulation in Tunnelling 2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6099-2_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage mechanics of jointed rock in tunnelling

Abstract: Abstract. In this chapter, an anisotropic damage model is established in strain space to describe the behavior of jointed rock masses under compression-dominated stress fields. The research work focuses on rate-independent and small-deformation behavior during isothermal processes. It is emphasized that the damage variables should be defined microstructurally rather than phenomenologically for jointed rock masses, and a second-order "fabric tensor" is chosen as the damage variable. Starting from it, a one-para… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two examples of well-established and extensively applied damage models for ductile solids are the phenomenological Lemaitre and Chaboche's (1988) model and the micromechanics-based Gurson's (1977) model. For microcracked brittle or quasi-brittle materials such as concrete and rocks, some of the much simplified phenomenological models have also been adopted in the analysis of such important engineering structures as dams (Linsbauer et al, 1989;Yang et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two examples of well-established and extensively applied damage models for ductile solids are the phenomenological Lemaitre and Chaboche's (1988) model and the micromechanics-based Gurson's (1977) model. For microcracked brittle or quasi-brittle materials such as concrete and rocks, some of the much simplified phenomenological models have also been adopted in the analysis of such important engineering structures as dams (Linsbauer et al, 1989;Yang et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%