2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage monitoring of carbon fibre reinforced polymer composites using acoustic emission technique and deep learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smearing and plowing were responsible for the formation of a smoother surface, which prevented a sudden increase in the SWR of the composite. Under an applied load of 120 N, delamination and fiber breakage were observed, leading to an increased SWR, because the broken fibers no longer reinforced the matrix material 61 . Further investigation of the SEM images of the composite under an applied load of 140 N revealed plastic deformation that increased the SWR by increasing the surface roughness and contact area between the two surfaces, ultimately leading to more wear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smearing and plowing were responsible for the formation of a smoother surface, which prevented a sudden increase in the SWR of the composite. Under an applied load of 120 N, delamination and fiber breakage were observed, leading to an increased SWR, because the broken fibers no longer reinforced the matrix material 61 . Further investigation of the SEM images of the composite under an applied load of 140 N revealed plastic deformation that increased the SWR by increasing the surface roughness and contact area between the two surfaces, ultimately leading to more wear.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspection methods, such as X-ray tomography [1][2][3] and ultrasonic scanning, [4][5][6] are very effective for detecting defects in composites but require removing the part from the structure and are not suited for real-time monitoring. Nondestructive methods, such as acoustic emissions 3,7 and ultrasonic-guided waves (Lamb waves), 8 offer the advantages of in situ and real-time monitoring of the structures. However, those techniques require additional devices (sensors) attached to the analyzed structure and generally detect damage only at their immediate vicinity, thus limiting the sensing area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the greatest benefits of the parameter-based feature encoding is that it can significantly reduce the usage of storage and processing resources while maintaining the general features of the original signals. Threshold-based features are frequently used in the scenarios where the background noise is continuous and much weaker than the signals we are really interested in capturing [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%