2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-012-9399-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage seismic scenarios for Angra do Heroísmo, Azores (Portugal)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Damage studies using basic nonlinear structural models also pointed out some correlation between soil characteristics and structural damage [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Damage studies using basic nonlinear structural models also pointed out some correlation between soil characteristics and structural damage [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cases of recent urban resilience studies can be cited as the one carried out by Ferreira (2017) for the city center of Horta (Portugal). Other European cities have benefited from studies of seismic risk and buildings vulnerability assessment, such as, Angra do Heroísmo by Veludo et al (2013) and Lisbon by Lamego et al (2016). In Algeria, since the 2003 Boumerdes earthquake (Ms = 6.3), seismic vulnerability assessment studies of buildings throughout some large cities of Algeria have been carried: such as those done for Algiers by Farsi and Lazzali, 2003;Amina et al, 2010;Novelli et al, 2015, for Constantine city Boukri et al, 2014;Benhamouche, 2014;Guettiche et al, 2017, for Oran city by Senouci et al (2013) and for Annaba city by Athmani et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is then required to adopt and simulate potential earthquake scenarios [3] that may affect an urban area and its surroundings, which will allow to have a first idea on the spatial distribution of the damage and their extent, and to elaborate an action plan to confine the human and economic losses to their minimal level [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%