2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-019-00594-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage to churches in the 2016 central Italy earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the recent seismic events, many efforts of the scientific community have been done in order to develop appropriate procedures for implementing seismic vulnerability analysis (Formisano, 2017;Formisano and Marzo, 2017;Laterza et al, 2017;Lopez et al, 2019) and specific retrofitting interventions (Faggiano et al, 2009;Terracciano et al, 2015;D'Amato et al, 2017;Milani et al, 2017bMilani et al, , 2018. In particular, as previously introduced, recurrent seismic damages were observed in historic masonry buildings characterized by local out-of-plane and in-plane response mechanisms regarding one or more isolated structure portions (Lagomarsino and Podestà, 2004;Formisano et al, 2010;Leite et al, 2013;Gattulli et al, 2014;Milani and Valente, 2015b;Stockdale, 2016;Valente et al, 2016;Betti et al, 2018;De Matteis et al, 2019;Fuentes et al, 2019b;Penna et al, 2019;Ramirez et al, 2019).…”
Section: Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Of Historical Constructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the recent seismic events, many efforts of the scientific community have been done in order to develop appropriate procedures for implementing seismic vulnerability analysis (Formisano, 2017;Formisano and Marzo, 2017;Laterza et al, 2017;Lopez et al, 2019) and specific retrofitting interventions (Faggiano et al, 2009;Terracciano et al, 2015;D'Amato et al, 2017;Milani et al, 2017bMilani et al, , 2018. In particular, as previously introduced, recurrent seismic damages were observed in historic masonry buildings characterized by local out-of-plane and in-plane response mechanisms regarding one or more isolated structure portions (Lagomarsino and Podestà, 2004;Formisano et al, 2010;Leite et al, 2013;Gattulli et al, 2014;Milani and Valente, 2015b;Stockdale, 2016;Valente et al, 2016;Betti et al, 2018;De Matteis et al, 2019;Fuentes et al, 2019b;Penna et al, 2019;Ramirez et al, 2019).…”
Section: Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Of Historical Constructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, the traditional architecture of Mediterranean countries extensively used stone, especially limestone, giving rise to one of the most important parts of the historical heritage, despite the serious damage inflicted by recurring earthquakes [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A post-earthquake emergency in historical city centres often requires the implementation of safety measures for unmovable artistic assets, i.e., those which are integral to damaged structural components. This is the case with the frescoes, decorated plasters, mural paintings, mosaics and stuccoes, which are supported by vaults, columns, ceilings, or walls of a historical building [3,4]. This phase involves both structural engineers and experts on the preservation of CH assets, who usually can make decisions based on the compliance with safety conditions according to their specific knowledge (i.e., on the artistic asset or the structure) and suggest appropriate actions if necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%