1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00330811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage to DNA induces expression of the ruv gene of Escherichia coli

Abstract: Regulation of the ruv gene of E. coli was studied using phage Mud (Ap lac) to obtain a fusion of the lac genes to the ruv promoter. Beta-galactosidase synthesis in the ruv-lac fusion strain was induced by mitomycin C and other agents that damage DNA. The induction of beta-galactosidase could be altered by mutations either in lexA or recA from which it is concluded that ruv is regulated by lexA repressor. A possible function of ruv in promoting cell recovery following damage to DNA is discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
60
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because this test can only be used for values Ն 5, the hypergeometric law was used for the uvrD ::Tn5 ⌬(recA-srl )::Tn10 and the lexA ind3 strains for which the set was too small. (Shurvington and Lloyd, 1982;Shinagawa et al, 1988) and catalyse branch migration of Holliday junctions before resolution (Rafferty et al, 1996;Yu et al, 1997;Eggleston et al, 1997). The effect of a ruvA::Tn10 mutation, which abolishes the SOS-induced pathway of Holliday junction resolution, was therefore tested in uvrD mutants.…”
Section: Isolation Of Mutants With Increased Deletion Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because this test can only be used for values Ն 5, the hypergeometric law was used for the uvrD ::Tn5 ⌬(recA-srl )::Tn10 and the lexA ind3 strains for which the set was too small. (Shurvington and Lloyd, 1982;Shinagawa et al, 1988) and catalyse branch migration of Holliday junctions before resolution (Rafferty et al, 1996;Yu et al, 1997;Eggleston et al, 1997). The effect of a ruvA::Tn10 mutation, which abolishes the SOS-induced pathway of Holliday junction resolution, was therefore tested in uvrD mutants.…”
Section: Isolation Of Mutants With Increased Deletion Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because some of the genes involved in the recF recombination pathway, such as recN (Finch et al, 1985), recQ (Irino et al, 1986) and ruvA (Shurvington and Lloyd, 1982), are under the control of LexA, we examined the possible involvement of this pathway in uvrD-stimulated TRD. The RecF, RuvAB and RecQ proteins are required for more than 90% of the deletion events in uvrD mutants.…”
Section: Recf-dependent Pathway For Uvrd-stimulated Recombinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ruv mutations have little effect on conjugal recombination in otherwise wild-type strains, they reduce the ability of recombination in recBC sbcA and recBC sbcBC strains (11)(12)(13). This evidence suggests that the ruv locus may be involved in recombinational repair by the RecE and the RecF pathways.The ruv locus contains two genes, ruvA and ruvB, that constitute an operon regulated by the SOS system (3,27,29). Recently these genes were also shown to be involved in mutagenesis induced by UV and X irradiation and by some chemicals (9, 24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ruv locus contains two genes, ruvA and ruvB, that constitute an operon regulated by the SOS system (3,27,29). Recently these genes were also shown to be involved in mutagenesis induced by UV and X irradiation and by some chemicals (9,24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous study shows that RecG is present at ϳ3 molecules in M. tuberculosis cells, and its level marginally increases with DNA damage (53). In contrast to RecG, the basal levels of E. coli RuvA and RuvB proteins are known to exist at ϳ700 and 200 molecules, respectively (75,76). E. coli RuvA assembles into a tetramer, whereas RuvB exists as hexamer and such oligomeric forms of RuvA/RuvB are required for its optimal activity to catalyze unwinding of HJ as well as fork structures (21,(77)(78)(79).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%