2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage to temporoparietal cortex is sufficient for impaired semantic control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that our study utilised EEG, which has very limited spatial resolution, we cannot discuss our findings in terms of anatomical regions (see Ovando‐Tellez et al, 2023). However, we can suggest that the effect is widespread and likely to involve a distributed network of regions which includes frontal, temporal, and posterior regions, as it is the case in semantic cognition (Jefferies, 2013; Noonan et al, 2013; Ralph et al, 2017), especially semantic control (Jackson, 2021; Thompson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering that our study utilised EEG, which has very limited spatial resolution, we cannot discuss our findings in terms of anatomical regions (see Ovando‐Tellez et al, 2023). However, we can suggest that the effect is widespread and likely to involve a distributed network of regions which includes frontal, temporal, and posterior regions, as it is the case in semantic cognition (Jefferies, 2013; Noonan et al, 2013; Ralph et al, 2017), especially semantic control (Jackson, 2021; Thompson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, we can suggest that the effect is widespread and likely to involve a distributed network of regions which includes frontal, temporal, and posterior regions, as it is the case in semantic cognition (Jefferies, 2013;Noonan et al, 2013;Ralph et al, 2017), especially semantic control (Jackson, 2021;Thompson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In keeping with these results, the second possible explanation is that these regions (along with PFC) support semantic control (Jackson et al, 2021; Jackson, 2021; Lambon Ralph et al, 2017); a conclusion supported by convergent evidence from fMRI, rTMS and neuropsychology (Hallam et al, 2016; Jefferies, 2013; Whiteney et al, 2011; 2012). In fact, patients with damage to these brain regions not only show multimodal semantic control deficits (semantic aphasia: Jefferies & Lambon Ralph, 2006; Jefferies et al, 2008; Noonan et al, 2013; Thompson et al, 2022) but also present with ideational apraxia (Corbett et al, 2009a, 2009b; 2011; 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People with semantic aphasia have difficulty regulating semantic cognition across verbal and non-verbal tasks in different contexts (e.g., resolving lexical ambiguity in the context of distractors). Semantic aphasia is typically associated with left hemisphere cerebrovascular accidents impacting frontoparietal and/or posterior temporal lobe regions (Thompson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Semantic Control Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%