2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c06077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damage to the DPPC Membrane Induced by Shock Waves: Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Abstract: Shock waves have shown a promising application in biomedical membranes. What needs to be noticed is that a shock wave will cause damage to human tissues when it is too strong. The damage to dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine membranes induced by shock waves was studied by adopting all-atom molecular dynamics. It was found that as the impulse increased, the membrane became increasingly disordered and the folds became more severe with more water molecules in the hydrophobic area. The membrane impact process was divi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of bubbles, we observed slight compression, but the membranes recovered within a short time, and no pore formation was observed in the four membrane models (Figure 1b) when the shock waves passed through. This result is similar to earlier simulations; 16,40 however, it should be noted that the model only considers a small patch of the membrane, not a cell. The bubble plays a role of an amplifier, which can concentrate the energy of shock waves and form a water nanojet (Figure S2).…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the absence of bubbles, we observed slight compression, but the membranes recovered within a short time, and no pore formation was observed in the four membrane models (Figure 1b) when the shock waves passed through. This result is similar to earlier simulations; 16,40 however, it should be noted that the model only considers a small patch of the membrane, not a cell. The bubble plays a role of an amplifier, which can concentrate the energy of shock waves and form a water nanojet (Figure S2).…”
Section: ■ Introductionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We increase the shockwave impulse up to 30 mPa.s but similar results are obtained. This indicates that the shockwave alone does not induce significantly structural changes in the membranes, in agreement with previous studies [12,18,20,38,39]. Furthermore, the response of the normal and cancer membranes to the shockwave is similar.…”
Section: Pore Closuresupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The higher the shock speed, the thinner the membrane. This has often been found in pervious works. , As for AQP4, we can infer a slight change in the overall structure from the fluctuation of the RMSD (Figure c). However, the gating CE/SF region shows a significant change and adopts a inhibited conformation.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…(g) The water flux across the AQP4 channel after cavitation nanjet. Here the water flux is reported as the average number of water molecules through the channel per ns using the method of Melo et al (h) Comparison between theoretical (Gravelle model) values and our simulated values of water flux at u p = 1.3 km·s –1 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%