2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0008-6223(00)00014-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damping characteristics of CVI-densified carbon–carbon composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the corrosion proceeds for 10 h, the Q −1 has already reduced by about 50%. The drastic change is believed to originate from the weakness of interfacial sliding, which causes the energy to be dissipated 12–18,21,24,25 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the corrosion proceeds for 10 h, the Q −1 has already reduced by about 50%. The drastic change is believed to originate from the weakness of interfacial sliding, which causes the energy to be dissipated 12–18,21,24,25 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, IF is closely related to microstructural change on the materials because it is induced by some irreversible structural transformation in solid. Most researches on IF of CMCs have focused on its generation mechanisms 12–19 . Studies on the relationships between thermomechanical damage and IF of CMCs have also been reported 20,21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The induced strain energy in a composite material subjected to dynamic loading is absorbed through a variety of damping mechanisms. Regardless of the viscoelastic nature of polymer matrix, which is the main contributing factor in energy dissipation, 1 the interphase region 2−4 and damaged area 5 can affect the damping behavior of composites. Recently, it was shown that assembled carbon nanotube (CNT) forests on carbon fiber increase the damping coefficient of continuous fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites by 514% whereas dispersed CNTs show only 53% enhancement.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The induced strain energy in a composite material subjected to dynamic loading is absorbed through a variety of damping mechanisms. Regardless of the viscoelastic nature of polymer matrix, which is the main contributing factor in energy dissipation, the interphase region and damaged area can affect the damping behavior of composites. Recently, it was shown that assembled carbon nanotube (CNT) forests on carbon fiber increase the damping coefficient of continuous fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites by 514% whereas dispersed CNTs show only 53% enhancement. In nanocomposites, it is postulated that the improved damping response relies on increasing the friction area at the interface between the CNTs and matrix phase. Nevertheless, the damping performance of dispersed CNTs within the matrix phase of a polymer based composite is compromised by complex fabrication processes and reduction in stiffness .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon fiber reinforced ceramic matrix composites are promising for applications requiring not only high strength, high fracture toughness, and low specific weight but also at ultrahigh temperatures , . More recently, fabricating silicon-containing CMCs from polysilanes, polysiloxanes, polycarbosilanes, and polysilazanes, the so-called polymer-derived ceramics (PDCs), has gained interest because of the advantages of their low processing temperatures, controllable ceramic compositions and neat-net-shapes .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%