2006
DOI: 10.1088/0143-0807/27/2/020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Damping forces—a friend or a foe in explaining mechanical motion?

Abstract: This paper presents simple, cheap, easily accessible and, for students, impressive demonstration experiments for three typical examples of physical systems for which damping forces ought to be involved in the equations of motion: a body falling in air, a damped mechanical oscillator, and Foucault currents. The various models of such forces are studied using an elementary physical and mathematical approach. It appears, maybe as a slightly surprising result, that a commonly used model of damping forces in mechan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, friction is neglected in many topics and related examples of undergraduate theoretical mechanics courses. In textbooks, the simplest problems of a damped harmonic oscillator or pendulum are typically used to present friction phenomena in undergraduate mechanics (recently, these problems have been studied and extended for educational purposes in [2][3][4]; some more advanced problems have recently been solved for students to get a better understanding of the topic; see e.g. [5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, friction is neglected in many topics and related examples of undergraduate theoretical mechanics courses. In textbooks, the simplest problems of a damped harmonic oscillator or pendulum are typically used to present friction phenomena in undergraduate mechanics (recently, these problems have been studied and extended for educational purposes in [2][3][4]; some more advanced problems have recently been solved for students to get a better understanding of the topic; see e.g. [5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%