2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dams and population displacement on China’s Upper Mekong River: Implications for social capital and social–ecological resilience

Abstract: China is home to nearly half of the world's 50,000 large dams, which provide irrigation, flood protection, and hydroelectricity. Most of these projects involve substantial population displacement, which can disrupt social capital, the webs of interdependence and support that community members maintain with one another through relationships of trust and reciprocity. We use new empirical evidence to examine the association between dam-induced displacement and social capital in China and interpret our findings in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
61
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Other changes to the social dynamic of Bo Hon village were harder to document, and one of the more important social changes was the decline in reciprocity between households to assist with labor or materials when they were in short supply. In work by Tilt and Gerkey [32], they have suggested inter-household exchange of financial resources and labor were key indicators of social capital. On that basis, the reduction in labor exchange between households experienced after resettlement in Bo Hon village would indicate a diminished social capital, even though levels of support were difficult to quantify.…”
Section: Social Capital and Capacity-building In Resettled Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other changes to the social dynamic of Bo Hon village were harder to document, and one of the more important social changes was the decline in reciprocity between households to assist with labor or materials when they were in short supply. In work by Tilt and Gerkey [32], they have suggested inter-household exchange of financial resources and labor were key indicators of social capital. On that basis, the reduction in labor exchange between households experienced after resettlement in Bo Hon village would indicate a diminished social capital, even though levels of support were difficult to quantify.…”
Section: Social Capital and Capacity-building In Resettled Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a household's social capital affects its production and marketing efficiency. This is mainly because households with a higher level of social capital usually have better access to information concerning marketing approaches supporting forestry production [48]. Thus, based on the above argumentation, we hypothesize:…”
Section: Hypothesis 1 (H1)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Various forestland characteristics can be assumed to lead to different forestry production profiles [48]. Larger forestland areas can induce economies of scale, so a higher rate of economic return per unit of forestland would be expected from larger forestland areas [49].…”
Section: Hypothesis 2 (H2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, for many communities near Bui Dam, it is difficult to quantify the contributions of social capital because of the complex network of association and reciprocity that exist within and among families and communities. It stands to argue that the need to address issues relating to capital assets, especially for dam impacted communities is critical (Tilt and Gerkey, 2016). Other community resource such as natural capital provide important resources to cope and overcome livelihood challenges such as dam construction (Raven, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%