2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2004.00227.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dangerous Work: The Gendered Nature of Bullying in the Context of Higher Education

Abstract: This paper discusses results from a research project which set out to investigate gender differences in the nature and experience of bullying within the higher education sector.Gender differences emerged in the form and perception of bullying as well as in target response. Results also indicate that, irrespective of gender, bullies can capture and subvert organizational structures and procedures (official hierarchies, mentoring systems, probationary reviews) to further their abuse of the target and to conceal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
130
1
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
6
130
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…At work, there is considerable scope for subtle and covert tactics of leadership that can lead to ambiguity in terms of the attributions of the witnesses (Leymann 1990), and specific scenarios that are perceived to warrant intervention may not be as easily identifiable as in other bystander studies (Ryan and Wessel 2012). Consequently, many incidents of work-related bullying can be misinterpreted as strong or negative management (Simpson and Cohen 2004). Additionally, work-related acts are seen as more acceptable than personal abuse (Escartín et al 2009) and physical bullying across cultures (Power et al 2013), and more subtle by human resource professionals (Fox and Cowan 2014).…”
Section: Bystander Behaviour and Type Of Bullyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At work, there is considerable scope for subtle and covert tactics of leadership that can lead to ambiguity in terms of the attributions of the witnesses (Leymann 1990), and specific scenarios that are perceived to warrant intervention may not be as easily identifiable as in other bystander studies (Ryan and Wessel 2012). Consequently, many incidents of work-related bullying can be misinterpreted as strong or negative management (Simpson and Cohen 2004). Additionally, work-related acts are seen as more acceptable than personal abuse (Escartín et al 2009) and physical bullying across cultures (Power et al 2013), and more subtle by human resource professionals (Fox and Cowan 2014).…”
Section: Bystander Behaviour and Type Of Bullyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research carried out on emotional intelligence includes that associated with stress, burnout, discrimination, and bullying (Kinman et al, 2006;Lewis, 2004;O'Boyle, 2001;Simpson and Cohen, 2004). Emotional intelligence can also be influential in helping teachers cope with stressful experiences (Nelson et al, 2006;Selva and Loh, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regular reports in the professional media (e.g. the Times Higher Education Supplement, Guardian Education) of stress, burn out, discrimination and bullying are mirrored in more academic accounts internationally (Kinman et al 2006;Lewis 2004;O'Boyle 2001;Simpson and Cohen 2004). Indeed, the HE sector in the UK has been taken to task by the Health and Safety Executive over unacceptable stress levels at work (Sanders 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%