2009 American Control Conference 2009
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2009.5160488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dangers of two-point holonomic constraints for variational integrators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A set of holonomic constraints of the form h i (q) = 0, is incorporated in the integrator at the endpoints as h i (q k+1 ) = 0 [18]. As the DEL equations are only in terms of configurations, the constrained DEL equations ensure that holonomic constraints are exactly satisfied at every time step.…”
Section: A Numerical Properties Of the Integratormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of holonomic constraints of the form h i (q) = 0, is incorporated in the integrator at the endpoints as h i (q k+1 ) = 0 [18]. As the DEL equations are only in terms of configurations, the constrained DEL equations ensure that holonomic constraints are exactly satisfied at every time step.…”
Section: A Numerical Properties Of the Integratormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nice part of the story is that the integrators derived in this way naturally preserve (or nearly preserve) the quantities that are preserved in the continuous framework, the symplectic form, the total energy (for conservative systems) and, in presence of symmetries, the linear and/or angular momentum (for more details, see [36]). Furthermore, other aspects of the continuous theory can be "easily" adapted, symmetry reduction [7,10,22], constraints [23,25], control forces [8,39], etc.…”
Section: Discrete Mechanics and Variationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simplest of the cases, that is, the case where one considers a Lagrangian of the form kinetic minus potential energy, L(q, q) = 1 2 qT M q − U (q), with M a constant mass matrix; s = 2 micro-nodes (inner-stages); and Lobatto's quadrature, c 1 = 0, c 2 = 1; one may show that both schemes, spRK (23) and sG (29), reduce to the well-known leap-frog or Verlet method. They will differ when the previous main assumptions are violated, for instance if M is not constant or the quadrature is other than Lobatto's.…”
Section: High Order Variational Integrators High Order Variational In...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation