Danish translation and adaptation of Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment 2nd Edition (LOTCA-II)

Lund, Karina; Oestergaard, Lisa Gregersen; Maribo, Thomas

doi:10.3109/11038128.2013.768292

Cited by 7 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We used the score of motor praxis area of LOTCA-II (the second edition of LOTCA) for validating K-AST as a further evaluation. This assessment tool identifies a broad range of cognitive dysfunctions in orientation, visual and spatial perception, motor praxis, visuomotor organization, and thinking operation [151617]. Among these six areas, the motor praxis area of LOTCA-II consists of three subsets (motor imitation, use of object, and symbolic action).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and Validity of Korean Version of Apraxia Screen of TULIA (K-AST)

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability and validity of Korean version of AST (K-AST) as a bedside screening test of apraxia in patients with stroke for early and reliable detection.MethodsAST was translated into Korean, and the translated version received authorization from the author of AST. The performances of K-AST in 26 patients (21 males, 5 females; mean age 65.42±17.31 years) with stroke (23 ischemic, 3 hemorrhagic) were videotaped. To test the reliability and validity of K-AST, the recorded performances were assessed by two physiatrists and two occupational therapists twice at a 1-week interval. The patient performances at admission in Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE), self-care and transfer categories of Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and motor praxis area of Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment, the second edition (LOTCA-II) were also evaluated. Scores of motor praxis area of LOTCA-II was used to assess the validity of K-AST.ResultsInter-rater reliabilities were 0.983 (p<0.001) at the first assessment and 0.982 (p<0.001) at the second assessment. For intra-rater (test-retest) reliabilities, the values of four raters were 0.978 (p<0.001), 0.957 (p<0.001), 0.987 (p<0.001), and 0.977 (p<0.001). K-AST showed significant correlation (r=0.758, p<0.001) with motor praxis area of LOTCA-II test. K-AST also showed positive correlations with the total FIM score (r=0.694, p<0.001), the selfcare category of FIM (r=0.705, p<0.001) and the transfer category of FIM (r=653, p<0.001).ConclusionK-AST is a reliable and valid test for bedside screening of apraxia.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and Validity of Korean Version of Apraxia Screen of TULIA (K-AST)

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Most research concerning the translation and adaptation of an assessment tool recommend using an expert panel where all the participants are in consensus regarding all the translated items [28,37,38]. This is a very time-consuming procedure and, as previously referred to, the EASI is extensive with 20 different subtests and many items and instructions.…”

Section: Focus Groups With An Expert Panelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The content analysis following the interviews aimed at detecting patterns of cultural difficulties between the translated version of the EASI and the original. Focus group interviews have been used in the earlier stages of the process in other translation studies [36,[38][39][40], and content analysis was conducted in two of them [36,40]. The participants for the expert panel focus groups were chosen mainly for their clinical experience with the EASI target population (children 3-12 years) but also for their interest in ASI.…”

Section: Focus Groups With An Expert Panelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The recommendations in the guidelines by both Beaton et al [28] and WHO [37] are to perform a back translation even prior to engaging the expert panel. However, it was determined in this study to do it the other way around, which Lund et al [38] had previously done. The aim was to capture as many problematic areas as possible before exposing it to the back-translation process.…”

Section: Back Translationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the performance-based test – Evaluation in Ayres Sensory Integration^®

Holmlund

Orban

2020

Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The Evaluation in Ayres Sensory Integration V R (EASI) is a performance-based assessment tool, aiming to assess sensory perception, sensory reactivity, postural/ocular/bilateral integration, and praxis in children aged 3-12 years. These types of tests are currently not available in Swedish. A structured, multistep process of translation is crucial for maintaining equivalence between the source and target version of a test. Objective: Develop a culturally adapted Swedish research version of the EASI for use in the forthcoming international normative data collection. Method: The translation process followed the first four stages in recommended guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation. Each subtest was translated by two occupational therapists and merged into one Swedish version. That version was reviewed by clinical paediatric occupational therapists in focus groups. The meetings were recorded, transcribed and a content analysis was conducted. One subtest was then subjected to a back-translation process. Result: Some discrepancies regarding semantic equivalence were found and adapted through all stages. No discrepancies regarding idiomatic or conceptual equivalence were found. Revisions due to the translation process have been incorporated into the final research version of the EASI. Conclusion: A first, culturally adapted research version of the EASI is ready for the Swedish normative data collection.

show abstract

“…LOTCA-II is considered an important instrument because it is validated, does not require certification, and because of its potential to supplement assessments of patients' performance in activities of daily living by clarifying patients' cognitive dysfunctions (11). The instrument has recently been translated into Danish and adapted to the Danish context (14). However, before implementing the Danish version of LOTCA-II (LOTCA-II/D) in clinical practice, it is important to test its reliability and internal consistency in clinical settings.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and internal consistency of the Danish version of Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment 2nd Edition (LOTCA-II/D)

Lund

Oestergaard

Maribo

2014

Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Danish translation and adaptation of Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment 2nd Edition (LOTCA-II)

Abstract: The Danish version of LOTCA-II was successfully translated and adapted based on the WHO guidelines. Before implementation in clinical practice further research of the reliability and validity of the LOTCA-II/D are needed.

Cited by 7 publications

References 7 publications

Reliability and Validity of Korean Version of Apraxia Screen of TULIA (K-AST)

Reliability and Validity of Korean Version of Apraxia Screen of TULIA (K-AST)

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the performance-based test – Evaluation in Ayres Sensory Integration^®

Reliability and internal consistency of the Danish version of Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment 2nd Edition (LOTCA-II/D)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Danish translation and adaptation of Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment 2nd Edition (LOTCA-II)

Abstract: The Danish version of LOTCA-II was successfully translated and adapted based on the WHO guidelines. Before implementation in clinical practice further research of the reliability and validity of the LOTCA-II/D are needed.

Cited by 7 publications

References 7 publications

Reliability and Validity of Korean Version of Apraxia Screen of TULIA (K-AST)

Reliability and Validity of Korean Version of Apraxia Screen of TULIA (K-AST)

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the performance-based test – Evaluation in Ayres Sensory Integration®

Reliability and internal consistency of the Danish version of Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment 2nd Edition (LOTCA-II/D)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the performance-based test – Evaluation in Ayres Sensory Integration^®