Aquatic Biodiversity II 2005
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4111-x_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daphnia species diversity in Kenya, and a key to the identification of their ephippia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2a-g), among which six were frequently present (.10% of the 383 observations) and abundant (at least 1% of the overall fossil inventory). This species diversity amounts to all Daphnia taxa known from East Africa, apart from the Daphnia obtusa complex, which is restricted to high-mountain environments (Mergeay et al 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2a-g), among which six were frequently present (.10% of the 383 observations) and abundant (at least 1% of the overall fossil inventory). This species diversity amounts to all Daphnia taxa known from East Africa, apart from the Daphnia obtusa complex, which is restricted to high-mountain environments (Mergeay et al 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abundances of Daphnia and fish fossils were expressed as the number of remains per gram of dry sediment per year (i.e., their production flux) to correct for both changes in sedimentation rate and sediment compaction with depth. The Daphnia were identified to species morphologically and/or genetically (Mergeay et al 2005(Mergeay et al , 2006b). Variation in temporal resolution between sampled intervals was not correlated ) Abundance changes over time in the Daphnia species inhabiting Lake Naivasha over the past 1800 years (DM represents dry mass) in relation to (h) reconstructed changes in fish abundance, (i) lake water salinity (represented by the conductivity of dissolved salts), and ( j) lake depth, as well as (k) the stratigraphic variation in sediment composition that allowed with Daphnia species richness (Pearson product-moment correlation, r ¼ 0.053, P ¼ 0.296) or Shannon diversity (r ¼ 0.071, P ¼ 0.163).…”
Section: Reconstruction Of Daphnia Community Change Through Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ephippium morphotype M1 was identified as belonging to species of the Daphnia pulex Leydig, 1860 group, based on two morphological identification keys created by Vandekerkhove (2004) and Mergeay et al (2005). Vandekerkhove's key also permitted us to presume that the M3 morphotype is related to Daphnia ambigua Scoufield, 1946 species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the current South African D. pulex is most likely an exotic hybrid that has replaced a native D. pulex, which was closer to the European populations (Mergeay et al, 2006 (Sars, 1916;Fig. 10), which is found also in East Africa (Löffler, 1968, Mergeay et al, 2005, wide molecular surveys (De Gelas and De Meester, 2005) have not taken the South African populations into account, therefore we cannot speculate on their origin. Adamowicz et al (2009) (Fig.…”
Section: Neglected South African Taxa: the Example Of Daphniamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…D. dolichocephala and D. cf. gibba are not restricted to South Africa, but extend up to Kenya (Mergeay et al, 2005), whereas D. propinqua, D. coronata and D. tenuispina have not been reported more north. Our knowledge about the exact distribution and even our definition of the latter taxa is limited, yet these forgotten names could well shelter true endemics of Southern Africa.…”
Section: Neglected South African Taxa: the Example Of Daphniamentioning
confidence: 92%