2021
DOI: 10.1177/10600280211058754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daratumumab for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Clinical Applicability and Operational Considerations

Abstract: Objective: To review the available data for the efficacy and safety of daratumumab in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), both in the newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory settings, as well as provide additional guidance to clinicians on operational, safety, and supportive care considerations. Data Sources: A literature search of PubMed (1966 to October 2021) was conducted using the keywords daratumumab, Darzalex, and myeloma. Data were also obtained from prescribing information and unpublished abstracts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like for other monoclonal antibodies, infusion-related adverse reactions (IRRs), including upper respiratory symptoms (cough, throat irritation, nasal congestion, wheezing, or shortness of breath), chills, rash, and gastrointestinal symptoms, are the most common adverse events (AEs) in patients treated with DARA. 19,20 In our study, the incidence of IRRs was 27.27% in the standard infusion group and 1.35% in the rapid infusion group, which are comparable (p < 0.001). Our findings confirmed the results of the Barr et al 9 study, indicating the safety and feasibility of our regimen, which is consistent with the results of other studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Like for other monoclonal antibodies, infusion-related adverse reactions (IRRs), including upper respiratory symptoms (cough, throat irritation, nasal congestion, wheezing, or shortness of breath), chills, rash, and gastrointestinal symptoms, are the most common adverse events (AEs) in patients treated with DARA. 19,20 In our study, the incidence of IRRs was 27.27% in the standard infusion group and 1.35% in the rapid infusion group, which are comparable (p < 0.001). Our findings confirmed the results of the Barr et al 9 study, indicating the safety and feasibility of our regimen, which is consistent with the results of other studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The strength of this study is that we have investigated both TD and TI B-cell responses in the presence of DARA with a strong impact on TD stimulation and-in this respect-a differential outcome of different B-cell subsets, demonstrating the most impact of CD38 targeting on the activation and maturation of memory B cells into PBs and PCs. Although derived from an in vitro system, our findings do suggest a possible mechanism for the additional risk of bacterial and viral infections in MM patients receiving anti-CD38directed therapies in vivo (50,51). Where normally the barrier of immunological memory would protect patients, reduced recall responses by memory B cells upon TI or TD stimulation leave patients who receive DARA treatment prone to infections with common pathogens (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The binding of daratumumab with CD38 induces cell death through different Fc-mediated mechanisms: apoptosis, phagocytosis, and antibody- as well as complement-dependent cytotoxicity ( 27 ). Daratumumab causes an increase in the number of T cells in the bone marrow and blood, which results in a reinforcement of the immune response against malignant clonal cells ( 28 ). Based on the impressive results observed in several randomized phase III clinical trials ( 29 34 ), daratumumab is currently approved for the treatment of plasma cell tumors at different stages of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%