2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dare to make investments in industrial symbiosis? A conceptual framework and research agenda for developing trust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus groups further supplemented the information gathered in the literature review highlighting existing approaches, practice, features, and potential barriers. 16 , 2015 Benefits of industrial symbiosis; case studies of best practice and success; 'uncovering' of existing symbioses as an approach to build eco-industrial parks; economic benefits as drivers for stakeholders involvement Ramsheva et al 17 38 , 2018 Potential of peer-to-peer approach, sharing economy, circular economy and industrial parks in reducing GHG emissions; application of blockchain; Industry 4.0; need to study industrial symbiosis from perspectives of circular economy and industrial ecology; contribution of industrial symbiosis to circular economics. 36 , 2012 Analysis of industrial symbiosis as self-organising complex system; Analysis of eco-industrial parks using energy as an indicator; nontechnical barriers such as lack of cooperation and trust for implementing industrial symbiosis; buy-in from top management required to remove barriers for industrial symbiosis; Modular approach for industrial symbiosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus groups further supplemented the information gathered in the literature review highlighting existing approaches, practice, features, and potential barriers. 16 , 2015 Benefits of industrial symbiosis; case studies of best practice and success; 'uncovering' of existing symbioses as an approach to build eco-industrial parks; economic benefits as drivers for stakeholders involvement Ramsheva et al 17 38 , 2018 Potential of peer-to-peer approach, sharing economy, circular economy and industrial parks in reducing GHG emissions; application of blockchain; Industry 4.0; need to study industrial symbiosis from perspectives of circular economy and industrial ecology; contribution of industrial symbiosis to circular economics. 36 , 2012 Analysis of industrial symbiosis as self-organising complex system; Analysis of eco-industrial parks using energy as an indicator; nontechnical barriers such as lack of cooperation and trust for implementing industrial symbiosis; buy-in from top management required to remove barriers for industrial symbiosis; Modular approach for industrial symbiosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the Organising stage, the EIP transformation project moves from uncommitted planning to increasingly committed implementation. After the communication between stakeholders in the previous stage, these channels are used to foster commitment and formalise the future of the EIP (Ramsheva et al, 2019), which may be upset by changes in policy if government authorities are heavily involved in the transformation (ElMassah, 2018b;Veiga & Magrini, 2009) or if several government programmes are involved (Zhang et al, 2010). Integrating the needs and goals of different stakeholders while achieving a substantial IS network is critical here to achieve economic and environmental outcomes (Costa & Ferrão, 2010;von Malmborg, 2004).…”
Section: Process Of the Eips Transformation Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ramsheva et al (2019) specify that firms first develop calculation-based trust in the commercial viability of EIPs, then knowledge-based trust from participating in and/or observing successful cooperation, and then identification-based trust as firms' goals and decision-making becomes collectivised, but the function of calculation-based trust is most prominent in the reviewed literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying a broader 'service' and 'system' perspective on CE entails going beyond the cement and concrete production sites and engaging construction sector stakeholders. Establishing collaborative activities between stakeholders in CE networks for sharing knowledge and information is considered essential for reducing environmental impact of industries [17][18][19]. In a CE, stakeholders are not viewed in isolation but rather as part of a circular 'system' where they can generate joint interests and advantages through collaboration [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%