2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dark matter and no dark matter: on the halo mass of NGC 1052

Abstract: The NGC 1052 group, and in particular the discovery of two ultra diffuse galaxies with very low internal velocity dispersions, has been the subject of much attention recently. Here we present radial velocities for a sample of 77 globular clusters associated with NGC 1052 obtained on the Keck telescope. Their mean velocity and velocity dispersion are consistent with that of the host galaxy. Using a simple tracer mass estimator, we infer the enclosed dynamical mass and dark matter fraction of NGC 1052. Extrapola… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If this was not the case, NGC 1052-DF2 would have already experienced the tidal forces of the massive galaxy or even been disrupted. This is in agreement with Forbes et al (2019). The idea that the absence of tidal features indicates an initial infall of the UDG also holds if we use the dynamical mass derived in the previous section (Sec.…”
Section: The Tidal Radius Of Ngc 1052-df2 and Its Distancesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If this was not the case, NGC 1052-DF2 would have already experienced the tidal forces of the massive galaxy or even been disrupted. This is in agreement with Forbes et al (2019). The idea that the absence of tidal features indicates an initial infall of the UDG also holds if we use the dynamical mass derived in the previous section (Sec.…”
Section: The Tidal Radius Of Ngc 1052-df2 and Its Distancesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…4.3 and therefore we can infer that the distance between both galaxies has to be larger than ∼ 168 kpc. The virial radius of NGC 1052 is 390 kpc (Forbes et al 2019), and consequently, we cannot fully reject the scenario where NGC 1052-DF2 and NGC 1052 are associated only on the basis of the absence of tidal features. However, the lack of tidal distortion is indicative that if they are associated, NGC 1052-DF2 is in its initial infall into the group.…”
Section: The Tidal Radius Of Ngc 1052-df2 and Its Distancementioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to explore a region wide enough to cover the environment around NGC 1052 we selected an analysis area of 6×6 degrees, corresponding to 2.07×2.07 Mpc at the distance of NGC 1052, which is of 20 Mpc (Tully et al 2013). We thus explore an environment of at least 1 Mpc around NGC 1052 at its distance (the virial radius of NGC 1052 has been calculated to 390 kpc by Forbes et al 2019). In coordinates this region comprises 37.37º < R.A. < 43.27º and -11.26º < Dec. < -5.26º.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in the bottom panels of Figure 5, the relative distance between NGC 1052-DF2 and NGC 1052-DF4 is significantly larger than the virial diameter of NGC 1052, which means that at least one of the galaxies is not bound to the group. The virial diameter is 780 ± 54 kpc (Forbes et al 2019), calculated from the NGC 1052 halo mass assuming an NFW profile with concentration parameter c = 7.0 and the error comes from their reported velocity dispersion uncertainty. NGC 1052-DF2 is perhaps the most likely candidate for being unbound, given its large radial velocity compared to other galaxies in the group (van Dokkum et al 2018b), and the fact that its distance is only just consistent with that of NGC 1052.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%