2022
DOI: 10.1007/jhep02(2022)067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dark Matter interpretation of the neutron decay anomaly

Abstract: We add to the Standard Model a new fermion χ with minimal baryon number 1/3. Neutron decay n → χχχ into non-relativistic χ can account for the neutron decay anomaly, compatibly with bounds from neutron stars. χ can be Dark Matter, and its cosmological abundance can be generated by freeze-in dominated at T ∼ mn. The associated processes n → χχχγ, hydrogen decay H → χχχν(γ) and DM-induced neutron disappearance $$ \overline{\chi} $$ χ ¯ … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a kind of generic feature in determining the relic via co-annihilations in which the mass difference between two particle species should be comparable to the temperature at the relevant epoch [8]. In particular, the freeze-out temperature of χ in the non-relativistic scenario turns out to be T F ∼ (m n − m χ ) ∼ O (10) MeV for m χ = 0.92 GeV. It is clear that this condition is not satisfied for the relativistic freeze-out scenario when the mass of χ is away from the neutron mass.…”
Section: Relic Density Constraintmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a kind of generic feature in determining the relic via co-annihilations in which the mass difference between two particle species should be comparable to the temperature at the relevant epoch [8]. In particular, the freeze-out temperature of χ in the non-relativistic scenario turns out to be T F ∼ (m n − m χ ) ∼ O (10) MeV for m χ = 0.92 GeV. It is clear that this condition is not satisfied for the relativistic freeze-out scenario when the mass of χ is away from the neutron mass.…”
Section: Relic Density Constraintmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…n + χ p + e − , where χ is considered as a charge-neutral Dirac fermion. Such a process can be motivated by the lepto-quark mediator models [9] in solving B-physics anomalies as well as solving the neutron decay anomaly [10]. Moreover, the process considered here can be instrumental for detecting sub-GeV particles (DM or exotic neutrinos) on the betadecaying nuclear targets [11][12][13].…”
Section: Coannihilation With Neutronmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are τ n (tot) = 878.52 ± 0.46 s (N = 9 and S = 1.8) and τ n (beam) = 888.0± 2.0 s (N = 2 and S = 0.3) which clearly disagree. A priori, it would be possible to hypothesize an additional neutron decay channel, into particles that are not detected, which would shorten the total average lifetime -a possible way out recently attempted [36]. This would require an agreement between the prediction and the exclusive measurement, namely that of τ n (beam), which is not what is observed: the predicted value τ n (SM) agrees with τ n (tot), but not with τ n (beam).…”
Section: The Neutron Lifetime Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are τ n (tot) = 878.52 ± 0.46 s (N = 9 and S = 1.8) and τ n (beam) = 888.0 ± 2.0 s (N = 2 and S = 0.3) which clearly disagree each other. A priori, it would be possible to hypothesize an additional neutron decay channel, into particles that are not detected, which shortens the total average lifetime -a possible way out recently attempted [35]. This would require an agreement between the prediction and the exclusive measurement, namely that of τ n (beam), which is not what is observed: the predicted value τ n (SM) agrees with τ n (tot), but not with τ n (beam).…”
Section: The Neutron Lifetime Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%