2005
DOI: 10.1353/vp.2006.0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Darkening the Subject of Hopkins' Prosody

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through the rhythmic novelty, Hopkins intended to reflect the dynamism in nature, Victorian cult of going away from the tradition and celebrate this. Poetry, for Hopkins, is instress, apprehension of an object in its intense texture; and it paves the way to grasp the inscape of the subject in its own distinctive design inscape (Hurley, 2005). Hopkins takes poetry as an enactment for celebration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Through the rhythmic novelty, Hopkins intended to reflect the dynamism in nature, Victorian cult of going away from the tradition and celebrate this. Poetry, for Hopkins, is instress, apprehension of an object in its intense texture; and it paves the way to grasp the inscape of the subject in its own distinctive design inscape (Hurley, 2005). Hopkins takes poetry as an enactment for celebration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sprung rhythm is an irregular prosodic system, a meter propounded by Gerard Manley Hopkins. It is based on the determinate number of accented syllables in a line permitting an indeterminate number of unaccented syllables (Hurley, 2005). In a sprung rhythm, a foot may be composed of one to four syllables, while in English meters it is composed of two or three syllables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 We have also consulted recent work by literature scholars on sprung rhythm that has addressed Kiparsky's study: Holder (1995), Wimsatt (1998, 2006) and Hurley (2005). We have not found this work helpful for our purpose, since it does not in general address the distributional evidence on which Kiparsky's system rests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also consulted recent work by literature scholars on sprung rhythm that has addressedKiparsky's study : Holder (1995),Wimsatt (1998Wimsatt ( , 2006 andHurley (2005). We have not found this work helpful for our purpose, since it does not in general address the distributional evidence on which Kiparsky's system rests.2 For Hopkins as phonetician/phonologist, see his essay inHouse (1959: 267-288), and the correspondence inAbbott (1935aAbbott ( : 41, 1935bAbbott ( : 44, 180, 1956.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%