2017
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Darkness into light? Identification with the crowd at a suicide prevention fundraiser promotes well‐being amongst participants

Abstract: Suicide is recognised to be subject to social contagion, with an elevated risk of adverse outcomes amongst those affected. Drawing upon research within the social identity approach, we hypothesised that, for those bereaved by suicide, identifying with similar others could provide ‘a social cure’. A large cross‐sectional study and a longitudinal study were carried out at a charity fundraiser for suicide prevention, with participants completing an online survey before and after the event. Results showed that, fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those who had lost someone they knew and/or a family member to suicide were found to have a significant increase in well‐being after the event, and this was mediated by identification with the crowd. Although Kearns et al () did not specifically measure trauma symptoms, their findings support the idea that social identification may be protective in a posttraumatic context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those who had lost someone they knew and/or a family member to suicide were found to have a significant increase in well‐being after the event, and this was mediated by identification with the crowd. Although Kearns et al () did not specifically measure trauma symptoms, their findings support the idea that social identification may be protective in a posttraumatic context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Both family identification and family constraints were more strongly associated with posttraumatic stress than social support, with identification relating to lower symptoms, and constraints relating to higher symptoms. Finally, Kearns, Muldoon, Msetfi, and Surgenor () measured participants before and after a charity fundraiser for suicide prevention. Those who had lost someone they knew and/or a family member to suicide were found to have a significant increase in well‐being after the event, and this was mediated by identification with the crowd.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, then, emergent stigma associated with a "spoiled" identity (Goffman, 2009) may reduce the capacity for people to draw upon social identity resources. To test this idea, a study was conducted to examine the potential for an initiative aimed at reducing stigma and improving collective belonging to act as a "social cure" in a naturalistic setting in Ireland (Kearns, Muldoon, Msetfi, & Surgenor, 2017). Participants were attendees at a large suicide awareness-raising event who completed measures of their own exposure to suicide, their sense of belonging and connection to others at this community event, and their positive affect, both before the event and afterwards.…”
Section: Understanding Traumatic Responses As a Process Of Social Idementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further recruitment stemmed from study information published in local media outlets and radio interviews conducted on local stations to raise awareness of the study. Those who completed the paper survey did so in person at workplaces and shopping centers local to each area, where efforts were made to recruit participants who may not otherwise have taken part in the study—those who did not have access to or were unable to use the Internet (including an older population), and men, who continually demonstrate low response rates to studies focusing on mental health (Kearns, Muldoon, Msetfi & Surgenor, ); something that can also be seen in the current study. Evidence that these sampling methods were successful can be seen in that there was a significant difference in age among those who took part in the survey in person ( M = 42.60, SD = 18.42) compared to those who completed the survey online ( M = 32.85, SD = 11.56), p < .001.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%