2018 4th IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization and Workshops (NetSoft) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/netsoft.2018.8460047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DARN: Dynamic Baselines for Real-time Network Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main contributions of this paper are threefold: (1) a machine learning‐based algorithm that automatically generates network baselines, (2) an analytics approach that adapts the generated baselines to changes in network conditions, and (3) a learning algorithm that allows the system to learn from baseline breaches and metric similarities to minimize false alarms. This paper is an extension of an earlier version 4 with the following improvements: (1) a background discussion on LSTM has been added, (2) we have improved the discussion of related work, (3) we have compared the prediction accuracy of LSTM with other state‐of‐the‐art time series prediction techniques, (4) we have added an example to demonstrate the effect of expert feedback, and (5) we have added a flowchart to summarize the steps involved in the proposed approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The main contributions of this paper are threefold: (1) a machine learning‐based algorithm that automatically generates network baselines, (2) an analytics approach that adapts the generated baselines to changes in network conditions, and (3) a learning algorithm that allows the system to learn from baseline breaches and metric similarities to minimize false alarms. This paper is an extension of an earlier version 4 with the following improvements: (1) a background discussion on LSTM has been added, (2) we have improved the discussion of related work, (3) we have compared the prediction accuracy of LSTM with other state‐of‐the‐art time series prediction techniques, (4) we have added an example to demonstrate the effect of expert feedback, and (5) we have added a flowchart to summarize the steps involved in the proposed approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Simulations show that it can allow reducing by 50% the duration of the training phase of the LSTM NN. LSTM NNs have been used to adapt network baseline estimation to changes in cloud environments as well, as described in [35]. Authors propose to create a network baseline through LSTM AEs, adapting it when metric trend changes.…”
Section: Deep Lstm-based Autoencodersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider in this work, as an illustrative example, a monitoring variable that represents the CPU utilization of a pollee node. In the state space, the quality Θ is defined as good when the monitored CPU utilization is under a fixed threshold, which we set to 60% as suggested in [5]. If the monitored attribute value crosses this threshold, an anomaly is considered and has to be detected by the poller node.…”
Section: A Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wuhib et al [4] proposed an adaptive aggregation protocol of monitoring data to detect threshold crossings, where nodes dynamically adjust their neighbor interaction rates which considerably reduce communication overhead. Mijumbi et al [5] developed DARN, a real-time monitoring system using machine learning and neural networks. The goal of DARN is to classify the monitoring metrics into clusters and then automatically generates and adapts the lower and upper baselines of the changes in network operating conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%