2002
DOI: 10.1162/014892602320991347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dartmouth Symposium on the Future of Computer Music Software: A Panel Discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Puckette, 2002). However, Max is not a musical composition language as such, but an instrument design language (Lyon, 2002).…”
Section: Software Environments For Creative Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Puckette, 2002). However, Max is not a musical composition language as such, but an instrument design language (Lyon, 2002).…”
Section: Software Environments For Creative Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time for a pleasing appeal there must be some small violations of the melody pattern. A cognitive psychologist, an audience member in a panel discussion on the future of computer music software (Lyon, 2002), expressed the aforesaid enlightened view and the present work attempts a straightforward implementation of such a musical organization. In order to accomplish the same, shaping the melodic pattern (MP), rhythmic pattern (RP) as well as the melody violation part (MVP) by means of appropriate mathematical forms is essential.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Sound manipulation tools were the first frontier of this new music, from a long range of studios and research institutions around the world. Even now, which will be discussed in depth later, as tools for manipulating spatial trajectories and for composing with space have become more and versatile, many composers still work in the stereo format (Lyon 2014).…”
Section: Perceiving Spacementioning
confidence: 99%