2009
DOI: 10.1101/gr.088336.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Darwinian and demographic forces affecting human protein coding genes

Abstract: Past demographic changes can produce distortions in patterns of genetic variation that can mimic the appearance of natural selection unless the demographic effects are explicitly removed. Here we fit a detailed model of human demography that incorporates divergence, migration, admixture, and changes in population size to directly sequenced data from 13,400 protein coding genes from 20 European-American and 19 African-American individuals. Based on this demographic model, we use several new and established stat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
159
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
159
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, molecular population genetic analyses of selection often focus on detecting selective sweeps driven by positive directional selection in a species-wide sample (Nielsen 2005). Only recently have studies started to scan patterns of gene nucleotide diversity for signatures of selection below the species level, particularly among human regional subpopulations (Tang et al 2007;Nielsen et al 2009;Pickrell et al 2009;Chen et al 2010). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, molecular population genetic analyses of selection often focus on detecting selective sweeps driven by positive directional selection in a species-wide sample (Nielsen 2005). Only recently have studies started to scan patterns of gene nucleotide diversity for signatures of selection below the species level, particularly among human regional subpopulations (Tang et al 2007;Nielsen et al 2009;Pickrell et al 2009;Chen et al 2010). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a cross-population test, we use the joint frequency spectrum of two populations, referred to as the crosspopulation SFS, or XP-SFS (Sawyer and Hartl 1992;Chen et al 2007;Gutenkunst et al 2009;Nielsen et al 2009). Given two population samples of size n and m, the XP-SFS is defined as a n 3 m matrix j, where the j ij entry represents the number of polymorphic sites at frequency i/n in the first sample, and j/m in the second sample.…”
Section: Population Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a serious practical concern because many populations of humans, Drosophila, and domesticated species have demographic histories that are far more complex than allowed for by the SNM (Wright et al 2005;Thornton and Andolfatto 2006;Stephan and Li 2007;Gutenkunst et al 2009;Lohmueller et al 2009;Wall et al 2009;vonHoldt et al 2010). One strategy that has been widely employed to deal with the problem of demography is to use a more realistic demographic model to define the critical values of the standard tests of neutrality (Akey et al 2004;Wright et al 2005;Li and Stephan 2006;Thornton and Andolfatto 2006;Nielsen et al 2009). Such an approach should be successful if the demographic model used is a reasonable one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%