Poliomyelitis continues to be a formidable problem in clinical medicine and public health. Although no one would today seriously question the infectious character of the disease, our knowledge of its pathogenesis is still imperfect. Thus, insusceptibility to the virus, exemplified by the extent of racial and individual resistance, is so widespread that an attack of poliomyelitis after known exposure is the exception rather than the rule. Again, while the effect of age, season and climate on the outbreak of epidemics of poliomyelitis is well established, the manner in which these factors affect the mechanism of resistance to the disease remains obscure. The irregular spread of the infection has been interpreted as indicating a wide dissemination of the virus among civilized populations, with the further inference that a majority of adult individuals can carry it without ill effects. Precisely where one should look for the source of this insusceptibility, however, is a question on which opinions are sharply divided. Most authorities incline to the belief that the protection is due to an almost universal process of specific immunization against the infectious agent, brought about either by abortive attacks of the disease (Wickman (1); Paul, Salinger and Trask (2)) or by latent epidemization (Wernstedt (3); Aycock (4)). The arguments which support these hypotheses have been gathered largely from epidemiological observations. While the various data taken at their face value, particularly when viewed in the light of analogy with other infectious diseases, are suggestive, the evidence can by no means be considered as conclusive. On