“…These determinations for the more abundant taxa, and literature data from Widbom {1984), Hickel (1975), and Faubet {1982) were fitted according to the actual percentages of size classes in the above net sample and thus yielded the following average individual dry weights (all in ~tg) used for biomass calculation: holoplanktonic Appendicularia and Chaetognatha 1.0, calanoid copepods 1.5 (including copepodites but excluding nauplii), planktonic PlatheIminthes 1.0, Rotatoria 0.2 (estimate}; meroplanktonic taxa, nectochaeta larvae and barnacle nauphi 0.3, barnacle cypris larvae 3.0, spionid larvae 5.0, juvenile (5 to 6-setiger) Arenicola marina L. and trochophore larvae 1.0; semiplanktonic harpacticoids 0.8 (including copepodites but excluding nauphi), cyclopoids 0.3, plathelminths 1.0; benthic Ostracoda 2.0, Nematoda 0.5, and Plathelminthes 1.0 (all ~tg DW).…”