1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf01611694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Das Mesozooplankton im Sylter Wattenmeer (Nordsee)

Abstract: KURZFASSUNG: Das Mesozooplankton im Sylter Wattenmeer (Nordsee). Untersuchungen der Anzahl und Biomasse der wichtigsten Zooplankter (> 150/am) im Sylter Wattenmeer von M~irz bis November zeigten, daf~ auch im Wattenmeer mit seinem hohen Anteil meroplanktischer Larven die holoplanktischen calanoiden Copepoden stets dominieren. Vier Copepodenarren bildeten im Mittel 85 °/0 der Zooplanktonbiomasse. Lediglich yon Juni bis September waren andere Gruppen nennenswert vertreten, vor allem Polychaetenlarven (15 % der B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These determinations for the more abundant taxa, and literature data from Widbom {1984), Hickel (1975), and Faubet {1982) were fitted according to the actual percentages of size classes in the above net sample and thus yielded the following average individual dry weights (all in ~tg) used for biomass calculation: holoplanktonic Appendicularia and Chaetognatha 1.0, calanoid copepods 1.5 (including copepodites but excluding nauplii), planktonic PlatheIminthes 1.0, Rotatoria 0.2 (estimate}; meroplanktonic taxa, nectochaeta larvae and barnacle nauphi 0.3, barnacle cypris larvae 3.0, spionid larvae 5.0, juvenile (5 to 6-setiger) Arenicola marina L. and trochophore larvae 1.0; semiplanktonic harpacticoids 0.8 (including copepodites but excluding nauphi), cyclopoids 0.3, plathelminths 1.0; benthic Ostracoda 2.0, Nematoda 0.5, and Plathelminthes 1.0 (all ~tg DW).…”
Section: Biomass Estimationmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These determinations for the more abundant taxa, and literature data from Widbom {1984), Hickel (1975), and Faubet {1982) were fitted according to the actual percentages of size classes in the above net sample and thus yielded the following average individual dry weights (all in ~tg) used for biomass calculation: holoplanktonic Appendicularia and Chaetognatha 1.0, calanoid copepods 1.5 (including copepodites but excluding nauplii), planktonic PlatheIminthes 1.0, Rotatoria 0.2 (estimate}; meroplanktonic taxa, nectochaeta larvae and barnacle nauphi 0.3, barnacle cypris larvae 3.0, spionid larvae 5.0, juvenile (5 to 6-setiger) Arenicola marina L. and trochophore larvae 1.0; semiplanktonic harpacticoids 0.8 (including copepodites but excluding nauphi), cyclopoids 0.3, plathelminths 1.0; benthic Ostracoda 2.0, Nematoda 0.5, and Plathelminthes 1.0 (all ~tg DW).…”
Section: Biomass Estimationmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Thus, sediment-associated meiofauna is only an insignificant component of traditional ship-operated plankton samples (e.g. Hickel, 1975;Martens, 1980). However, semiplanktonic swimmers may aggregate close to the sediment surface, as has been demonstrated by D'Amours (1988).…”
Section: Semiplankton Worldwide Significant In Shallow Watersmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore, some of our stations in the Wadden Sea area have a water depth of less than one metre which is too shallow to close a water sampler. Hickel (1975) obtained up to 10 times more zooplankton compared to net hauls in the research area with the same methods used during this investigation. Even relatively quick zooplankton species such as chaetognatha or copepods like Anomalocera patersonii are caught in higher numbers than with a zooplankton net.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…They are thought to be representative for the whole water column. According to Hickel (1975), the strong tidal currents prevent a stratification in the tidal channels. This is confirmed by recent measurements with profiling CTD-probes which show no stable stratification in the research area (Martens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation