Das V-Modell® XT

Friedrich, Jan; Hammerschall, Ulrike; Kuhrmann, Marco; Sihling, Marc

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01488-8

Cited by 30 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition to those databases, we also take contributions into account that are not referred by the databases, but have to be considered as key contributions, e.g. books such as [25,19,42,17]. For such contributions, we add a category "misc".…”

Section: Data Collection Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…AMI, AFI, ADF, ACP [25,19] Measurement Measurement using KPIs is important, e.g., to provide the top management with status information, to measure the project's performance and to coduct data that are important for a company-wide controlling [6,34]. Measurement causes additional effort in a project and also requires a more detailed reporting.…”

Section: Sub Contractorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…ARE, AAR, AIT [42,18,25,19] Project role Each project has a specific role that characterizes a project in relation to other projects. The typical setting is a client and a contractor where the contract defines the actual roles.…”

Section: Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

“…ARE, AAR, AIT [42,18,25,19] Financial controlling The emphasis on a financial controlling is important if a project is critical w.r.t. the project budget.…”

Section: Sub Contractorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…ARE, APD, AFL, AIW [25,19] Clear project proposal A clear project proposal is an essential artifact. It contains basic goals and requirements [47,48,53] essential for the project's success.…”

Section: Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Criteria for software process tailoring: a systematic review

Kalus¹,

Kuhrmann²

2013

Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software and System Process

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Independently from which software process was selected for a company or a project, the selected software process usually cannot be applied without any customization. Although the need to tailor a software process to specific project requirements seems to be widely accepted and unquestioned, the way of doing the tailoring remains unclear and is, therefore, often left to the expertise of process engineers or project managers. What are the criteria to be applied in the tailoring? What are dependencies between different criteria and how should certain criteria influence the software process? In this paper we investigate concrete tailoring criteria for the tailoring of software processes. To this end, we present a collection of 49 tailoring criteria as the outcomes of a systematic literature review. We further analyze the impact of the discovered tailoring criteria by relating them to a set of 20 exemplary tailoring actions, which affect the projectspecific software process. Our outcomes show that the factors influencing the tailoring are well understood, however, the consequences of the criteria remain abstract and need to be interpreted on a project-per-project basis.

show abstract

Section: Data Collection Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sub Contractorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sizementioning

confidence: 99%

“…ARE, AAR, AIT [42,18,25,19] Financial controlling The emphasis on a financial controlling is important if a project is critical w.r.t. the project budget.…”

Section: Sub Contractorsmentioning

confidence: 99%