1977
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7381(77)80056-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data acquisition and processing in high-resolution mass spectrometry using ion counting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a simple analysis shows3 a number of bins, or steps of data recording per peak FWHM, of 4–5 may be quite sufficient for good estimation of peak location and intensity.…”
Section: Transformation Of Tof Data To Provide An Almost Constant Nummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a simple analysis shows3 a number of bins, or steps of data recording per peak FWHM, of 4–5 may be quite sufficient for good estimation of peak location and intensity.…”
Section: Transformation Of Tof Data To Provide An Almost Constant Nummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was shown [13], if condition (14) holds, then the area A will be an efficient estimate of the peak intensity. We confirm this fact experimentally by measuring isotopic ratios of krypton [34].…”
Section: The Peak Shape Model For Tof Mass Spectrometermentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Handling a large volume of the obtained experimental data requires significant computational resources. This stimulates many authors to develop and improve methods, algorithms and software for mass spectra processing [5,8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our knowledge there are no equations for prediction of overall uncertainty resulting from peak‐calculation of mass spectrometry signals, despite the fact that peak‐calculation remains the default method for peak assignment in most software packages. A cited publication from 1977 claims 4–5 points per peak are sufficient, but we have been unable to review this work, and, as noted here, the improvements in S/N for modern instruments likely invalidate the justifications for so few data points 14. We have addressed this gap in understanding by simulating a comprehensive set of peaks with known parameters, then performing peak‐calculation with standard methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%