2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10869-022-09853-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Aggregation in Multilevel Research: Best Practice Recommendations and Tools for Moving Forward

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern indicates that there was substantial within-group agreement in ratings of leader empathy, meeting commonly accepted criteria for justifying aggregation (cf. Bliese, 2000; LeBreton & Senter, 2008; LeBreton et al, 2023).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This pattern indicates that there was substantial within-group agreement in ratings of leader empathy, meeting commonly accepted criteria for justifying aggregation (cf. Bliese, 2000; LeBreton & Senter, 2008; LeBreton et al, 2023).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 The "Too Little/Too Much" Rating Scale Used in the Leadership Versatility Index 360-Degree Feedback Instrument recommended that researchers also examine interrater reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC): specifically, ICC(1), an estimate of the reliability of a single rater, and ICC(2), an estimate of the reliability of the mean rating aggregated across raters for each leader. Because ICC(2) varies as a function of group size, a general ICC(2) was estimated based on the median number of direct reports per leader (Mdn = 5) as recommended by LeBreton et al (2023). For the overall research sample, the mean r wg value was .90, ICC(1) was .17, and ICC(2) was .51.…”
Section: Changes In Leader Empathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Best practice guidelines [ 73 76 ] recommend clinician ratings of first-level leadership and clinic implementation climate be aggregated and analyzed at the clinic level. To justify aggregation, guidelines recommend that researchers test the level of inter-rater agreement among clinicians within each clinic to confirm there is evidence of shared experience.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%