Data‐based analysis of bivariate copula tail dependence for drought duration and severity

Abstract

In recent decades, copula functions have been applied in bivariate drought duration and severity frequency analysis. Among several potential copulas, Clayton has been mostly used in drought analysis. In this research, we studied the influence of the tail shape of various copula functions (i.e. Gumbel, Frank, Clayton and Gaussian) on drought bivariate frequency analysis. The appropriateness of Clayton copula for the characterization of drought characteristics is also investigated. Drought data are extracted from standardized precipitation index time series for four stations in Canada (La Tuque and Grande Prairie) and Iran (Anzali and Zahedan). Both duration and severity data sets are positively skewed. Different marginal distributions were first fitted to drought duration and severity data. The gamma and exponential distributions were selected for drought duration and severity, respectively, according to the positive skewness and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The results of copula modelling show that the Clayton copula function is not an appropriate choice for the used data sets in the current study and does not give more drought risk information than an independent model for which the duration and severity dependence is not significant. The reason is that the dependence of two variables in the upper tail of Clayton copula is very weak and similar to the independent case, whereas the observed data in the transformed domain of cumulative density function show high association in the upper tail. Instead, the Frank and Gumbel copula functions show better performance than Clayton function for drought bivariate frequency analysis. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Bivariate index-flood model: case study in Québec, Canada

“…The choice of the adequate copula is in 403 agreement with those of similar studies e.g Lee et al (2012). 404…”

Drought severity–duration–frequency curves: a foundation for risk assessment and planning tool for ecosystem establishment in post-mining landscapes

“…2). As the choice of copula can be very different from one climate region to another (Khedun et al, 2013) the present study focused on the Frank and Gumbel copulas (Appendix B), as they perform best when analysing the bivariate drought dependence structure of drought variables such as severity and duration Reddy and Ganguli, 2012;Shiau, 2006;Lee et al, 2013;Wong et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2011 …”

Bivariate flood frequency analysis using the copula function: a case study of the Litija station on the Sava River

“…Copulas are often a good alternative to the most commonly used univariate frequency analyses. Among other applications, copula functions have been used for modelling droughts (Kao and Govindaraju, 2010;Wong et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2011;Reddy and Ganguli, 2012a;Lee et al, 2013;Ma et al, 2013;Wong et al, 2013), rainfall analysis (Singh and Zhang, 2007;Zhang and Singh, 2007a;Gargouri-Ellouze and Chebchoub, 2008;Ghosh, 2010;Vandenberghe et al, 2010;Balistrocchi and Bacchi, 2011;Ariff et al, 2012), assessing the risk of dam overtopping (De Michele et al, 2005), hyetograph analysis (Grimaldi and Serinaldi, 2006b), flood coincidence risk analysis (Chen et al, 2012), geostatistical models (Bardossy, 2006) and, indeed, flood frequency analysis (Grimaldi and Serinaldi, 2006a;Zhang and Singh, 2006;Renard and Lang, 2007;Zhang and Singh, 2007b;Karmakar and Simonovic, 2009). The first paper on copulas in hydrology was written by De Michele and Salvadori (2003), and in the next few years, several other papers were also published, e.g.…”