1971
DOI: 10.1063/1.1676430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data by NMR and Representations of Self-Diffusion Coefficients in Carbon Tetrafluoride and the Determination of Intermolecular Force Constants

Abstract: Self-diffusion coefficients were measured by the pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance method for pure carbon tetrafluoride for the conditions −30 to 75°C and 20–440 atm. As predicted by the dilute gas theory, the density—diffusivity product (ρD) versus density (ρ) at constant temperature was found to be almost constant up to a reduced density of about 0.4, above which ρD started decreasing sharply. Based on the corresponding states principle, three semiempirical representations for the data were developed and com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…60 The experimental initial slopes for other substances are, in general, slightly negative or almost zero. [22][23][24][25][26][30][31][32][33] On the other hand, the Enskog theory for hard spheres at higher densities gives a much more negative slope than the present. 3 Here we test whether the density dependence of D / ͱ T can be accounted for or not in analogy with the Enskog theory in terms of g͑͒.…”
Section: Density Dependence Of the Self-diffusion At Low Densitiescontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…60 The experimental initial slopes for other substances are, in general, slightly negative or almost zero. [22][23][24][25][26][30][31][32][33] On the other hand, the Enskog theory for hard spheres at higher densities gives a much more negative slope than the present. 3 Here we test whether the density dependence of D / ͱ T can be accounted for or not in analogy with the Enskog theory in terms of g͑͒.…”
Section: Density Dependence Of the Self-diffusion At Low Densitiescontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Self-diffusion coefficients have been determined for various supercritical fluids and gases by the van der Waals laboratory group, [22][23][24] Kobayashi and co-workers, 25,26 Jonas and co-workers, 18,27 and Asahi and Nakamura 28,29 using the PGSE method. Peereboom et al found that the initial slope of D for xenon is almost zero, in contrast to the prediction of the strongly negative slope by the Enskog theory for dense gases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy in the values of 11 is dependent on the accuracy in the knowledge of G , that is usually estimated in four ways: (i) theoretically, from the known dimensions, geometry, number of turns of wire in the coil, and current applied; (ii) by measuring the changes in the magnetic field when a small sample (commonly, water) is placed at different locations; (iii) by calibration (Cal) with a substance of known self-diffusion; and (iv) by the shape of the spin echo after the 90° pulse, which for cylindrical probes is related to the first-order Bessel function. Dawson et al and Khoury et al cited the use of a “flux-gate magnetometer” for this task by a procedure which is very close to the second way; that is, the apparatus indicates the values of the magnetic field along the axis of coils, and G is calculated with these data. For the methods of Burnett and Harmon and Barbe et al, the determination of G is not required.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of carbon tetrafluoride, where only two sets of supercritical points are available, it is not possible to know which are correct, since those of Khoury and Kobayashi 284 are systematically (20 to 40) % lower than those of Has and Ludemann. 291 For hydrogen, the neutron scattering 551 produced results (5 to 10) % higher than the spin−echo technique, 419 the former being in better agreement with the low-density tracer diffusivities than the latter.…”
Section: General Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of functions have been proposed to fit the self-diffusion coefficient data. They have been applied and tested for a variety of gases and liquids. The fitting functions can be categorized into the following types; (i) the Arrhenius type, ,,,,, (ii) the scaling to the hard-sphere model, ,,, , (iii) the simple hydrodynamic model or modified ones, , ,,,,,,, (iv) the molar-volume type, , (v) explicit terms of density and temperature, ,, (vi) the density expansion type, , and (vii) the gas kinetic theory with collision integrals. ,,,,,, The choice of the fitting function is based on the region of the thermodynamic states in which the function can appropriately represent the temperature and density dependencies of the self-diffusion coefficients. Some of them are based on physical concepts or meaning, but some others are simply phenomenological models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%