2002
DOI: 10.21273/horttech.12.4.567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Collection and Statistical Topics for the Preparation and Review of Manuscripts

Abstract: The challenges encountered and discussions generated during the review process of the manuscripts submitted to the Variety Trials category of HortTechnology have revealed the need to review issues encountered during manuscript preparation and to provide flexible guidelines for authors and reviewers. Using a question/answer format, this manuscript discusses issues related to data collection and statistical methods available to compare varieties. Clear objectives and conclusions, adequate plot size, care… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weather conditions were rated as acceptable, fertilization practices were good, irrigation practices were good, and pest incidence was light for the trial. Overall growing conditions for the trial were good (Osborne and Simonne, 2002). Growing conditions were acceptable at all locations so a valid comparison of entries over sites could be made.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Weather conditions were rated as acceptable, fertilization practices were good, irrigation practices were good, and pest incidence was light for the trial. Overall growing conditions for the trial were good (Osborne and Simonne, 2002). Growing conditions were acceptable at all locations so a valid comparison of entries over sites could be made.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All data were analyzed using analysis of variance (SAS, 2000). Mean separation was conducted using the Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch (REGWQ) multiple range test (Osborne and Simonne, 2002). Significant interaction means were separated using Fisher's least significant difference test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, however, weather conditions were acceptable, fertilization practices were good, irrigation practices were good, and pest incidence was light for the trial. Overall growing conditions for the trial were good (Osborne and Simonne, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Data were subjected to analysis of variance (SAS, 2000). Variety and site means were separated using the Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch (REGWQ) multiple range test (Osborne and Simonne, 2002…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When multiple traits are measured, a large number of cultivars can be compared using rank-sum approaches (Kleinhenz, 2003;Osborne and Simonne, 2002). These approaches rely on ranking cultivars for each trait and then summing the ranks to develop a single value for each cultivar or cultivar-site combination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%