2015
DOI: 10.1080/10598650.2015.11510830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data Collection Methods for Evaluating Museum Programs and Exhibitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All projects funded through the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Advancing Informal STEM Learning program must post a final evaluation report to the site (NSF, 2017), and other reports are posted voluntarily. Although the repository is likely not representative of all ISE evaluation reports-reports of internal evaluations, formative evaluations, and non-federally funded evaluations are likely underrepresented-it is regarded as a key resource for studying ISE evaluation (see, e.g., Fu et al, 2016;Grack Nelson & Cohn, 2015;Morrissey et al, 2014;Serrell, 2015). As such, it can provide a window into the criteria used in ISE evaluation.…”
Section: Methods: Sample Of Evaluation Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All projects funded through the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Advancing Informal STEM Learning program must post a final evaluation report to the site (NSF, 2017), and other reports are posted voluntarily. Although the repository is likely not representative of all ISE evaluation reports-reports of internal evaluations, formative evaluations, and non-federally funded evaluations are likely underrepresented-it is regarded as a key resource for studying ISE evaluation (see, e.g., Fu et al, 2016;Grack Nelson & Cohn, 2015;Morrissey et al, 2014;Serrell, 2015). As such, it can provide a window into the criteria used in ISE evaluation.…”
Section: Methods: Sample Of Evaluation Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of diverse data collection instruments (questionnaires, pre-and posttests, and worksheets) facilitated the collection of relevant data to assist in answering the research questions. The varied data collection instruments also 6 / 16 eliminated the prospect of mono-method bias, which can threaten the validity, such as in research that employs a single data collection method (Field, 2018;Nelson & Cohn, 2015).…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a combination of diverse data collection instruments (open-ended, closedended questionnaires, and pre-and post-tests) enables the data collection from multiple participants' perspectives. Furthermore, it eliminates the prospect of mono-method bias, potentially threatening validity, such as in research that employs a single data collection method [38].…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%