2022 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/isbi52829.2022.9761497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-Consistent Non-Cartesian Deep Subspace Learning for Efficient Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction

Abstract: Non-Cartesian sampling with subspace-constrained image reconstruction is a popular approach to dynamic MRI, but slow iterative reconstruction limits its clinical application. Data-consistent (DC) deep learning can accelerate reconstruction with good image quality, but has not been formulated for non-Cartesian subspace imaging. In this study, we propose a DC non-Cartesian deep subspace learning framework for fast, accurate dynamic MR image reconstruction. Four novel DC formulations are developed and evaluated: … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the rapidly evolving reconstruction strategies can help address this limitation 36–39 . For example, it has been reported 37 that deep learning–based reconstruction approaches can expedite reconstruction time up to 50 times compared with the iterative reconstruction approach that was used in this work. Further improvement in terms of postprocessing time needs to be explored for the clinical application of the proposed approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the rapidly evolving reconstruction strategies can help address this limitation 36–39 . For example, it has been reported 37 that deep learning–based reconstruction approaches can expedite reconstruction time up to 50 times compared with the iterative reconstruction approach that was used in this work. Further improvement in terms of postprocessing time needs to be explored for the clinical application of the proposed approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38][39][40][41][42][43] Deep-learning-based methods have also been applied to subspace reconstruction problems. [44][45][46][47] For example, a deep subspace learning method combined a deep network with a low-rank subspace modeling, thus allowing improved performance in T 1 mapping using a single-shot IR radial FLASH sequence. 46 However, those methods based on a supervised training paradigm demand fully sampled or reference data for training deep networks, which hinders their application in qMRI reconstruction problems where it may be prohibitively difficult to obtain fully sampled or reference data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MR image reconstruction, a combination of a deep‐learning‐based regularizer and parallel imaging forward model outperformed conventional parallel imaging and compressed sensing 38–43 . Deep‐learning‐based methods have also been applied to subspace reconstruction problems 44–47 . For example, a deep subspace learning method combined a deep network with a low‐rank subspace modeling, thus allowing improved performance in T 1 mapping using a single‐shot IR radial FLASH sequence 46 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 SR models trained only on k-space-truncated labels do not account for this additional T 2 blurring, complicating prospective application to TSE images. Recently, physics-driven deep learning methods have shown their value for various tasks in MRI, [12][13][14][15][16][17] and could be an effective approach to deal with TSE T 2 blurring in MRI SR. Currently, physics-driven neural networks have shown promise for PSF correction, but they have not been used in conjunction with SR. 18 Another barrier to prospective SR in MRI has been the "magnitude degradation" (MD) process (k-space truncation of magnitude images) used in early SR network training efforts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%