2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.101.224435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-driven determination of the spin Hamiltonian parameters and their uncertainties: The case of the zigzag-chain compound KCu4P3O12

Abstract: We propose a data-driven technique to estimate the spin Hamiltonian, including uncertainty, from multiple physical quantities. Using our technique, an effective model of KCu4P3O12 is determined from the experimentally observed magnetic susceptibility and magnetization curves with various temperatures under high magnetic fields. An effective model, which is the quantum Heisenberg model on a zigzag chain with eight spins having J1 = −8.54 ± 0.51 meV, J2 = −2.67 ± 1.13 meV, J3 = −3.90 ± 0.15 meV, and J4 = 6.24 ± … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By searching for (J 1 , J 2 , J 3 ) so that ∆ becomes minimum, we can estimate the model parameters that describe the target magnetization curve. In an actual problem involving model parameter estimation [28], the target property to be fitted is mainly the experimental result. Here, however, since the aim is to investigate the efficiency of PHYSBO for model estimation, we set the target magnetization curve as calculated using the Hamiltonian with (J 1 , J 2 , J 3 ) = (1.0, 0.5, 0.3); that is, these values are the solution to the model estimation problem.…”
Section: Model Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%

Bayesian optimization package: PHYSBO

Motoyama,
Tamura,
Yoshimi
et al. 2021
Preprint
Self Cite
“…By searching for (J 1 , J 2 , J 3 ) so that ∆ becomes minimum, we can estimate the model parameters that describe the target magnetization curve. In an actual problem involving model parameter estimation [28], the target property to be fitted is mainly the experimental result. Here, however, since the aim is to investigate the efficiency of PHYSBO for model estimation, we set the target magnetization curve as calculated using the Hamiltonian with (J 1 , J 2 , J 3 ) = (1.0, 0.5, 0.3); that is, these values are the solution to the model estimation problem.…”
Section: Model Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%

Bayesian optimization package: PHYSBO

Motoyama,
Tamura,
Yoshimi
et al. 2021
Preprint
Self Cite
“…However, the experiments are very expensive owning to hundreds of iterations involved. [29][30][31] On the contrary, only a few valuable data may be acquired by choosing the best predicted objectives. [16,32,33] In short, adaptive design can indeed provide new opportunities for discovering new materials owning to its powerful ability in extrapolating search.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%