2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1510227113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-driven identification of prognostic tumor subpopulations using spatially mapped t-SNE of mass spectrometry imaging data

Abstract: The identification of tumor subpopulations that adversely affect patient outcomes is essential for a more targeted investigation into how tumors develop detrimental phenotypes, as well as for personalized therapy. Mass spectrometry imaging has demonstrated the ability to uncover molecular intratumor heterogeneity. The challenge has been to conduct an objective analysis of the resulting data to identify those tumor subpopulations that affect patient outcome. Here we introduce spatially mapped t-distributed stoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
161
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
161
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HI-C, ATAC-seq), mass cytometry, mass cytometry imaging, multiplexed ion beam imaging (MIBI) and multiplexed fluorescence barcoding hybridization methods are the rapidly developing modalities that could be instrumental and the technical aspects of each methodology are described in more detail in the respective reviews [6064]. In the case of FFPE based diagnosis, mass spectrometry based techniques have been employed to spatially unravel molecularly distinct tumor subpopulations with clinically relevant attributes [65, 66]. There is also potential for integration of multiple ‘omics’ platforms, since some of these mass-spectrometric methods are also amenable to parameters such as metabolites [67].…”
Section: A Perspective That Heralds Single-cell Diagnostics?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HI-C, ATAC-seq), mass cytometry, mass cytometry imaging, multiplexed ion beam imaging (MIBI) and multiplexed fluorescence barcoding hybridization methods are the rapidly developing modalities that could be instrumental and the technical aspects of each methodology are described in more detail in the respective reviews [6064]. In the case of FFPE based diagnosis, mass spectrometry based techniques have been employed to spatially unravel molecularly distinct tumor subpopulations with clinically relevant attributes [65, 66]. There is also potential for integration of multiple ‘omics’ platforms, since some of these mass-spectrometric methods are also amenable to parameters such as metabolites [67].…”
Section: A Perspective That Heralds Single-cell Diagnostics?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we limited our study to a single approach to dimensional reduction, t-SNE. Although t-SNE has been shown to produce well-separated clusters in a variety of biomedical settings [31][32][33][34] , it is a stochastic method that relies on a number of user-specified inputs. Future work should include comparisons of t-SNE to other projection techniques, such as principal component analysis (PCA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This same workflow was used for the registration of SIMS imaging data to histology in Škrášková et al (). Furthermore, Abdelmoula et al () used t‐SNE, combined with bisecting k‐means, to study tumor heterogeneity and subpopulations in gastric and breast cancer. They used this setup to determine the number of subpopulations and assess their clinical significance.…”
Section: Manifold Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%