2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-Driven Ionic Liquid Design for CO2 Capture: Molecular Structure Optimization and DFT Verification

Abstract: To identify optimal ionic liquids (ILs) for CO2 capture, an efficient computer-aided IL design (CAILD) approach is desired. The traditional CAILD methods usually combine an equation of state with the UNIFAC-IL model to calculate gas solubility, which is computationally expensive and sometimes cannot give quantitatively satisfying results. In this contribution, a new CAILD approach is presented for the optimal design of ILs for CO2 capture, where mathematically simple and reliable data-driven models are applied… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To screen ILs/DESs, properties are needed, which can be determined experimentally or predicted theoretically. Theoretical models have been developed to predict properties of ILs/DESs qualitatively or quantitively, and the models include Quantitative Structure Property Relationship (QSPR) method ( Eike et al, 2004 ), regular solution theory ( Kilaru et al, 2008 ), Molecular dynamics ( Kerlé et al, 2009 ), Monte Carlo ( Shah and Maginn, 2005 ), group contribution method ( Kim et al, 2005 ; Zhang et al, 2021b ; Zhou et al, 2021 ), Conductor-like Screening Model for Real Solvents (COSMO-RS) method ( Liu et al, 2021 ), statistical associating fluid theory (SAFT)-based equation of state ( Ji et al, 2012 ; Ji and Zhu, 2013 ; Ji et al, 2014 ; Shen et al, 2015 ; Sun et al, 2019 ; Alkhatib et al, 2020 ; Sun, 2020 ), etc. Based on the properties, ILs and DESs are screened with different criteria, for example, thermodynamic CO 2 absorption capacity (CO 2 solubility and Henry’s constant) ( Liu et al, 2021 ) and (Henry’s constant, selectivity, relative polarity, and molar volumes) ( Sumon and Henni, 2011 ), thermodynamic and kinetic performances for CO 2 absorption (CO 2 absorption capacity, viscosity, melting point, and Henry’s constant) ( Farahipour et al, 2016 ; Zhang et al, 2021a ) as well as CO 2 chemical absorption properties (chemical equilibrium constants, Henry’s constants, and reaction enthalpies) ( Moya et al, 2020 ), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To screen ILs/DESs, properties are needed, which can be determined experimentally or predicted theoretically. Theoretical models have been developed to predict properties of ILs/DESs qualitatively or quantitively, and the models include Quantitative Structure Property Relationship (QSPR) method ( Eike et al, 2004 ), regular solution theory ( Kilaru et al, 2008 ), Molecular dynamics ( Kerlé et al, 2009 ), Monte Carlo ( Shah and Maginn, 2005 ), group contribution method ( Kim et al, 2005 ; Zhang et al, 2021b ; Zhou et al, 2021 ), Conductor-like Screening Model for Real Solvents (COSMO-RS) method ( Liu et al, 2021 ), statistical associating fluid theory (SAFT)-based equation of state ( Ji et al, 2012 ; Ji and Zhu, 2013 ; Ji et al, 2014 ; Shen et al, 2015 ; Sun et al, 2019 ; Alkhatib et al, 2020 ; Sun, 2020 ), etc. Based on the properties, ILs and DESs are screened with different criteria, for example, thermodynamic CO 2 absorption capacity (CO 2 solubility and Henry’s constant) ( Liu et al, 2021 ) and (Henry’s constant, selectivity, relative polarity, and molar volumes) ( Sumon and Henni, 2011 ), thermodynamic and kinetic performances for CO 2 absorption (CO 2 absorption capacity, viscosity, melting point, and Henry’s constant) ( Farahipour et al, 2016 ; Zhang et al, 2021a ) as well as CO 2 chemical absorption properties (chemical equilibrium constants, Henry’s constants, and reaction enthalpies) ( Moya et al, 2020 ), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although true component in the target system has been considered, prediction range and accuracy of UNIFAC are still unsatisfactory. Therefore, a machine learning model that is proven by many researchers to be suitable for multiple gases can improve prediction performance and obtain better solvents in our future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) isosurface, one can infer that LUMO spreads all over the donor and acceptor backbone including the S atom in the acceptor unit, but N. Visuals from the plots of LUMO+1, LUMO+2 and HOMO-1 show that they are also distributed around the donor and acceptor groups, but HOMO-2 is virtually distributed all over the FTPF monomer. Negative energy terms was obtained for both HOMO and LUMO (-5.7509 eV and -2.3274 eV, respectively) using DFT method at CAM-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) levels employed; an indication that all calculation converged appropriately at this level [21,52,[60][61][62]. The calculated HOMO-LUMO energy gap is 3.4256 eV, a relatively small energy gap which shows that FTPF polymer is a good candidate for application as opto-electrical component [22,23] in organic electronic devices like OPV cells.…”
Section: Frontier Molecular Orbital (Fmo) Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%