2019
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2019.2905348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Data-Driven Local Control Design for Active Distribution Grids Using Off-Line Optimal Power Flow and Machine Learning Techniques

Abstract: The optimal control of distribution networks often requires monitoring and communication infrastructure, either centralized or distributed. However, most of the current distribution systems lack this kind of infrastructure and rely on suboptimal, fit-and-forget, local controls to ensure the security of the network. In this paper, we propose a data-driven algorithm that uses historical data, advanced optimization techniques, and machine learning methods, to design local controls that emulate the optimal behavio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
82
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to consider the impact of generation uncertainty, we follow our previous work [23], [33] and we re-formulate the problem using chance constraints [34], [35]. We assume that the PV power injection is the only source of uncertainty (load uncertainty can be also included in a similar way) and we use as input forecast error distributions with different forecasting horizons (1 to 24 hours ahead).…”
Section: A Accounting For Uncertainty Through Chance Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to consider the impact of generation uncertainty, we follow our previous work [23], [33] and we re-formulate the problem using chance constraints [34], [35]. We assume that the PV power injection is the only source of uncertainty (load uncertainty can be also included in a similar way) and we use as input forecast error distributions with different forecasting horizons (1 to 24 hours ahead).…”
Section: A Accounting For Uncertainty Through Chance Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [23], [33] we model the voltage and current constraints as chance constraints that will hold with a chosen probability 1 − ε, where ε is the acceptable violation probability. E.g., the voltage and current magnitude constraints are reformulated as P {V min ≤ |V j,t | ≤ V max } ≥ 1 − ε and P |I br i,t | ≤ I i max ≥ 1 − ε, respectively.…”
Section: A Accounting For Uncertainty Through Chance Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal rules however are not necessarily linear: If an apparent power constraint becomes active, reactive injections can become nonlinear functions of solar generation. To capture this nonlinearity, recent approaches engage learning models which are trained to optimize: Given pairs of grid conditions (load and solar generation) and their optimal inverter dispatches computed, the aforesaid approaches learn dispatch rules using linear or kernel-based regression [20], [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison between the proposed single-step learning approach (rules R 1 ), and the two-step learning approach of [20]-[21] (rules R 2 ).+ N n=1 w n Z n λ n − λ n − M x n − u n + N n=1 b n λ n − λ n − M x n…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in both works only reactive power control is considered, neglecting possible combinations with other available controls, and a balanced operation is assumed. Reference [9] considered reactive control and active power curtailment, while [10], [12] extended the available measures to controllable loads and storage systems. Furthermore, while [8], [11] design local, open-loop controllers, [9], [10], [12] employ a feedback, closed-loop control scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%